I do, I believe you should test cleanly in order to receive welfare.
2007-05-10 05:08:53 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes, I do. I have to be clean to earn my money at my job, and I/We are the ones supporting them.
It is real hard for me to go and buy hamburger and hotdogs while they are buying steaks and seafood. I have a hard time shutting my mouth, but I keep quiet.
I agree truckjurn!!!
2007-05-10 05:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by shewolf 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes there should be drug-testing for welfare because to get on welfare you should be trying to manage your money, not out spending it on drugs and who knows what else.
2007-05-10 05:17:31 · answer #2 · answered by meltie6 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What if somebody had a severe-high quality interest and lost it through their drug use? could they be penalized for having an dependancy? can not you or maybe every physique you comprehend or human beings relate to dependancy and the impression it has on your human beings and family contributors? So let's imagine Bob loses his interest through being a drug addict and desires welfare tips. might i prefer to work out Bob hustling interior the line for money or committing crimes to assist himself or his habit? What help is there for human beings with drug addictions? most of the human beings on drugs can not pay for scientific care because it is. quickly we are going to be requiring drug sorting out to difficulty out drivers licenses. Now that honestly makes greater sense than this.
2016-12-11 05:37:05 · answer #3 · answered by lacuesta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. It's be one way to help ensure the money is being spent correctly. If they test positive then welfare should be denied.
If they don't practice birth control, welfare should also be denied.
2007-05-10 05:20:18 · answer #4 · answered by Bob-O 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think they should be abole to give the kids the services needed but not the parent.
I mean for example food stamps they should not include the amount for the parents which makes a significant amount of money.
I once knew a lady that got $1476 with three children and her and her hubby are complete bums.
2007-05-10 05:23:20 · answer #5 · answered by reene2g 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why would you not consider this as a prerequisite? Maybe it does violate those that aren't drug users so as part of the initial screening if they think your a druggie then go ahead and test and let the straight people alone!
2007-05-10 05:12:51 · answer #6 · answered by Jake 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. If the money is going to the dope man then the user should get no welfare. Otherwise, we are subsidizing a habit.
2007-05-10 05:13:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
.if there was drug testing for welfare then we would really know who should get it,who to take the children from & who should get a JOB.
2007-05-10 06:47:51 · answer #8 · answered by Helen44 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do and I also think they should have to go clean up roads or be crossing guards at schools or some kind of work for that money....
2007-05-10 05:22:17 · answer #9 · answered by Dixie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It already exists in Los Angeles County, CA.
2007-05-10 05:17:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋