Why do libs ask such inane questions?

Question

like wondering why we attacked Saddam after 9/11 when their own idol, The Great Philanderer, knew of Al-Queada/Saddam ties...

ARE AL QAEDA'S links to Saddam Hussein's Iraq just a fantasy of the Bush administration? Hardly. The Clinton administration also warned the American public about those ties and defended its response to al Qaeda terror by citing an Iraqi connection. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/527uwabl.asp

Stephen F. Hayes, author of the new book "The Connection: How al-Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein has Endangered America," says Clinton administration officials in the late 1990s and beyond were making regular references to Saddam, his WMD programs and association with al-Qaida. http://www.geocities.com/truthsavvyonline/clintons.html

The commission concluded, you'll recall, that the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon couldn't have been prevented, and that if there was negligence, it was as much the fault of the Bush Administration (for moving slowly on the recommendations of Clinton counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke) as of the Clinton administration.

Able Danger has changed all of that.

Able Danger was a military intelligence unit set up by Special Operations Command in 1999. A year before the 9/11 attacks, Able Danger identified hijack leader Mohammed Atta and the other members of his cell. But Clinton administration officials stopped them - three times - from sharing this information with the FBI. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9755.htm

The Clinton administration talked about firm evidence linking Saddam Hussein's regime to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network years before President Bush made the same statements. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112921-3401r.htm

Lamo, read the Able Danger section, if you can rad at all.

(...and no, "rad" was not a typo. If you can't get the slight then you really are quite Lame.)

Answer 1

Thank you a question with descent links and information. Personally I wish you had not included the lib tag. The Great Philanderer? U mean the next Good Bill Hunting ambassador?
The connection between 911 may never be fully revealed. I followed Swissair 111 and Pan, Pan, Pan was squawked by the
cockpit and the plane went down in Canadian waters... The call out is hijack not fire or mayday. (ex Continental Airlines In flight trainer) The information is out there. Just take your head out of the sand some of u. History is due to repeat itself.

Answer 2

Let me guess: You also believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus, right? I find it absolutely hilarious that the only argument Cons offer to support Bush's dismal record is to find ways to blame Clinton for everything. I'm not a Clinton fan by any means, but why can't you 28% fess up and call a spade a spade? Regardless of the mistakes that Clinton, Carter, Kennedy or FDR made, they do not excuse or diminish the incompetence of the worst president in history.

Answer 3

Socialization is mandatory for healthful progression. Nurturing is an important area of a healthful man or woman the two mentally besides as bodily. below are some links which you will locate clever. besides there are have been various books written relating to the adventure of Genie.

Answer 4

I was going to answer your first question but as I read on, I realized it was nothing but a Clinton bash. You need to recognize Clinton isn't in office anymore.
Most citizens are concerned about what's going on NOW. Soldiers are dying NOW on Bush's clock. That's what we need to be worried about.

Answer 5

Wait... what was your question again?

Was it, "Why didn't Bush do anything with the information Clinton gave him when he left office?"

Was that it?

Answer 6

Better question, why do conservatives rely on such broad unrelated generalizations?

Answer 7

Just trying to reach you on your level.