since Bill unilaterally invaded the former Yugoslavia without UN approval, gave Haliburtion a "no compete" contract to rebuild the region and used taxpayer money to bring over the terrorist refugees?
2007-05-10 02:20:12 · 10 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, as a Republican, I can't stand the blame game. These were six insane people that happened to find each other.
2007-05-10 02:23:12 · answer #1 · answered by Relax Guy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Rant on. How long ago are we talking here? You put Fort Dix and Yugoslavia in the same context? Grasping for straws again to blame Clinton. How pathetic can one get?
The FBI wasn't and isn't doing their job if those people are in the US and go undetected. What happened to the so called "Patriot" act? Isn't that supposed to root out such evil doers? It took an alert citizen to put the investigation in motion by calling his local police who contacted the FBI.
2007-05-10 10:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aren't you getting a little ridiculous. It isn't the same as Reagan and Nicaragua or Bush and Iraq.
I guess you like ethnic cleansing. And wasn't that NATO involved. And who stood trial for war crimes?
Funny, you guys were arguing just exactly the opposite when Clinton was in the white house than you are with Bush!
And what terrorist refugees were they?
2007-05-10 09:40:21 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, a sting operation to sell some guns to a couple of guys who wanted to perform a suicide mission by running into an army base with guns blazing is Clintons fault.
Almost seven years after he left office.
It's probably his penises fault.
2007-05-10 09:24:07 · answer #4 · answered by Joe M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Right, the Kansas tornado and the Missouri floods are Clinton's fault too. Don't forget the tropical storm that is hitting the east coast, all Clinton's fault too. When the sun dies in 10 billion years I am sure that there will be a Republican there saying that it was all Clinton's fault.
2007-05-10 09:26:04 · answer #5 · answered by diogenese_97 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A Clinton accept responsibility? Surely you jest.
2007-05-10 09:23:06 · answer #6 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
while i applaud your expose on the clintons, i don't necessarily think you can pin this on them completely...and, if you do that, why would they not claim credit for the capture?...they would, and you know it.
2007-05-10 10:12:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's not president anymore, but if he was, we wouldn't be in the stupid war we're in now.
2007-05-10 09:30:30 · answer #8 · answered by tigerkitty2 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That's simply an assinine question.
2007-05-10 09:22:43 · answer #9 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Helll no!
.
2007-05-10 09:25:23 · answer #10 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋