Lincoln and Churchill both had the forsight to see that there was a gathering threat and had to deal with it.
Lincoln and Churchill both had to deal with lieberal bedwetting moonbats determined to undermine their countries best efforts to fight the enemies.
President Bush will go down in history has one of Americas and the worlds, greatest men
2007-05-10 02:04:44 · 11 answers · asked by mefeelsgreat49 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Both of those historical figures are dead from the neck up, also.
2007-05-10 02:07:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
the solid previous days while their approval rankings have been extreme, and approximately how ungrateful human beings are that they don't rejoice with each and all of the sacrifice they have made. Its humorous to me, Bush's approval rankings have been at 28% final I knew, and a survey a twelve months or so back confirmed merely 72% of the yank human beings knew the call of the vice chairman. Any link on your innovations between the political know-how of the those that approve of the President?
2017-01-09 14:17:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both actually all three alone had to buck the defeatest tide to do the right thing and history was kind to them as a result and W will be vindicated.
2007-05-10 02:23:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing Bush wil go down in History for is: Being Cheney and Rove's Beeyotch boy.
2007-05-10 02:14:34 · answer #4 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Happy for you to compare him to Churchill - check out the Dardanelles campaign - stupid waste of human lives.
2007-05-10 02:16:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He will go down as the worst ever. It is an insult to compare him to those men.
Military glory--that attractive rainbow, that rises in showers of blood--that serpent's eye, that charms to destroy...
~Abraham Lincoln
Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived.
~Abraham Lincoln
The statesman who yields to war fever...is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events.
~Winston Churchill
2007-05-10 02:11:37 · answer #6 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush reminds me of a fret boy, who mentally never made it past 12.
2007-05-10 02:10:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Churchill faced down an enemy while his more sophisticated brethren heaped scorn upon him.
Lincoln was also reminded time and time again that his own people were not in favor of him or his war efforts.
Very good observation on your part.
2007-05-10 02:08:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nether he reminds me of Alfred E Newman. Dude change your pic its offensive.
2007-05-10 02:09:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Stalin comes to mind for me.
2007-05-10 02:10:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋