do they really think their opinions outweigh that of our president? that they could personally do a better job? that they are smarter, better versed or, more qualified?
when was the last time they were granted access to intelligence, briefed in private by the top generals, sat in on cabinet meetings and got daily first hand overviews of the situation in iraq? how many top advisers do they employ? how many international leaders do they personally converse with? how much education do they have? what background do they have in government? how many public offices have they held?
the answer to each is either no or, none. thank goodness we currently have a president that doesn't depend upon them to influence his decisions.
2007-05-09 23:30:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
just pointing out that without access to all the aforementioned information and intelligence, most are remiss in second guessing the president to the degree that they do here. perhaps, they need to keep in mind that there is much vital information that they couldn't possibly know when making the assumption that he is the one who is ignorant and bear in mind, that they are in fact, the ignorant ones.
a great politician such as clinton might place more importance upon opinion polls and ratings. however, a great leader such as bush, is more likely to base his decisions upon the proper intelligence and opinions of his cabinet.
at this time in our history, i am exceptionally proud of this president's efforts and resolve to be a great leader.
2007-05-10 00:08:35 · update #1
Maybe some of the responders were playing Nintendo in class when it was explained that we elect a president and then let him do his job. The way to try to get rid of him is in the voting booth, next time. Then again that's probably not what they were taught. Their socialist teachers probably tought them to only support liberal presidents while they're in office. Conservatives are fair game and should be attacked at every opportunity. Real Americans abide by the wishes of the voters. And spare us the "we're real Americans, too!" nonsense. Those who attempt to destroy a sitting, wartime president are americans in name only. No spin, just fact.
2007-05-09 23:58:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I are living close OKC and that file got here up on our regional TV information final night time. OK (and a couple of different states) nonetheless permit individual events hire desk house at gun suggests. You should purchase exchange or promote with out doing the Federal Paperwork... it is a individual treaty sale. That is the Brady "loophole" approximately gunshows. Funny factor is I can take an advert in a newspaper and promote the gun with out Federal forms both. Media spin at it is best... we get the backside of a record complied by way of persons with an time table... the best way I see matters Oklahoma has the 'fine' gun legislation. Some one smarter than me mentioned there are "lies, damned lies and information". The anti-gun foyer makes use of all 3 to control the clicking and trap liberals with no pastime so that you can kill our A2 rights. Join the NRA (or well suited organization ) at present!
2016-09-05 13:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When was the last timeYOU were granted access to intelligence, briefed in private by the top generals, sat in on cabinet meetings and got daily first hand overviews of the situation in iraq? how many top advisers do YOU employ? how many international leaders do YOU personally converse with? how much education do YOUhave? what background do YOU have in government? how many public offices have YOU held?
So what gives YOU the right to say the same thing. If that's YOUR strategy it is opinion versus opinion.
2007-05-09 23:54:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hahahaha you are a funny girl... the President is not appointed, he is elected...he is elected in because he promises the American People he will do what is best for this country, and we rely on him to do what is best for this country... now... living in a FREE country... I have the Freedom to disagree with the President when I feel he does something that I do not think is in the BEST interest of this country- he is a President, not a dictator... Everyone disagrees with what is best, which is why we have two different parties... Republicans and Democrats.. and working on Liberals.. I personally think Bush is to Conservative, I'm not so I disagree with him about a few things..but I can do that because I voted, I'm an American, I have the Freedom to say whatever I want...
2007-05-09 23:52:32 · answer #4 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
'cause that's who *does* run the country.
A party, or a president who refuses to listen to the people soon becomes unemplyed. Congress is now democratic, and in '08 the Decider Commander Guy will be gone as well. Deal with it, the Con reiagn of Terror is over. No more lies and deceit, and after the next election indictments will be forthcoming.
2007-05-09 23:56:17 · answer #5 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, they are called voters and they were hoodwinked into putting this idiot into office. At least some of them were, it appears that you are one of the easily fooled.
There is a name for a leader who doesn't listen to his constituents and does as he pleases. It's called a dictator.
You fail to understand that the money being spent is the property of those "private citizens", not of the Chimpinator.
As far as access to information, it's fairly obvious that the info has been cherry picked to suit the administration's agenda, in otherwords this idiot took only the info he wanted. He obviously chose wrong.
It's people like you that made Hitler possible. I hope you don't vote.
Chimpy is an elected leader, he is not the Emperor, or the king. There are other governments that work that way. Please feel free to join one of them.
2007-05-09 23:42:33 · answer #6 · answered by billiebob 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It called accountability and checks and balance.
From 2001-06 Republican congress gave Bush blank check for his policies no more voters spoke in 2006.
2007-05-10 01:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats have overplayed their feeble hand, they will be history when the 2008 election comes around.
2007-05-09 23:35:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Even with all that information it still doesn't mean that you have to blindly follow him. The president is not God, or appointed by God - he is fallable. Only in dictatorships do you have to swear blind allegiance to every move he makes.
2007-05-09 23:35:40 · answer #9 · answered by Mordent 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Does anyone else see the irony of this question seeing that Bush and Co. are champions of privatizing almost all goverment services and duties?
2007-05-09 23:37:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋