I don't know the answer, but your question made me laugh out loud first thing this morning. Thanx 4 the laugh. I don't see why not. However, I'm betting the officer would write you a ticket, claiming the "passenger" is not in any hurry to get anywhere. hahahahaahahaha
2007-05-10 00:42:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~RedBird~ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you've got a body in a hearse, you aren't in any kind of hurry.
Stay out of the car pool lane.
2007-05-10 00:40:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha thats humorous, i in no way seen that, yet while u think of roughly it, that could would desire to be some low cop if the hearse have been carring a individual and there became right into an prolonged line of relatives/acquaintances following at the back of it, and the hearse have been given pulled over! can u think of!
2016-10-15 06:23:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a great question! I'd say yes, a passenger is a passenger. By law you cannot discriminate against people because of their race, gender, religion, etc., I'd say that extends to breathing status as well. Necro-Americans have rights too...
I wonder if human organ delivery vans could get away with it too? I mean, what's the minimum percentage of a person to qualify as a passenger? 3%, 20%, 100%?
2007-05-10 00:46:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by normanbormann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I depends, see, some carpool lanes are required to take 3 bodies instead of two
2007-05-10 04:59:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Spock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you cant. Once that body is in the back, the vehicle is considered a delivery vehicle and not a high occupancy passenger vehicle.
2007-05-12 11:48:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not? If I were stopped Id' tell the cop I can't help it my passenger is dead. . I'd appeal, I'd go to the hearing, and explain, my passenger couldn't make it because he's still dead.
2007-05-09 19:54:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its not a tactic that would appeal to everyone. Unless you change cadaver's regularly there could be more than just congestion problems.
2007-05-12 20:37:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by shell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My best guess is that the regulations stipulate the number of "persons" or "passengers".
A corpse is not a "person", it is a corpse. A corpse is not a passenger, it is "cargo".
My guess is "no".
2007-05-10 06:16:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The 2nd person must be alive to qualify.
2007-05-10 03:42:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋