This is a very enlightened question. Actually science can't even prove that most of its teachings are correct. A example of this can be found in that light bulb over you head. They tell us that entergy is a form of matter. And that matter never is lost it just changes form. Thus entergy is not lost it just changes from yeat in the process of matter changing form there is entergy lost. That entergy is of such a amount that it is more then is required to make the jump from matter to entergy. So that missing matter went some were. So the actual answer is that science does not really have the whole picture of anything. In the case of matter becomeing entergy could it be that science observes only part of the picture because the other part of the picture is based in a another realm of existence of which they are not aware.
This example is just one. There are millions of them. And yes science has not been able to explain vast things in the universe. The problem is that this universe is made up of some very interesting things. And many have not been explained by science.
Other problems with science in explaining a thing is that they lack the mental understanding of the simple fact that all these events are not independant of one another. Cause and effect to the science types today only mean in simple observation of a small spectrum of observed nature. That leads to false date and false reasoning. This universe and all actions in it have a affect on all the other things in the universe. So in studying the world we have to consider the whole and not just the part. And to study the part is to dismise the wholes affect on the part. In other words it is half ****** and half baked.
So your answer is NO & YES
2007-05-09 16:19:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by the light exposes the darkenss 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't have a problem with that. In fact, I expect it. Anything which we cannot observe or for which we have insufficient information is beyond the realm of science. We, thus, have a lot of things that cannot be explained scientifically.
Beyond that, in a more relevant manner, I do not believe any sort of materialism, nor believe empiricism. If I reject those things, then I also reject that everything has a scientific explanation. It's an axiomatic judgment, just as much as the answer in the opposite is.
2007-05-09 16:07:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Innokent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not at all. Ever hear of Quantum Physics? Think of what you are asking. Scientists will be the first to admit that there are things they can not explain, but they are asking all kinds of questions determined to find the answers. That's what they do for a living. If everything was explainable, why have scientists?
2007-05-09 16:07:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shawn B 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Think about it: the only things that cannot be explained by science are:
1. things that have not happened yet
2. things that may have happened, but no one can prove they have
3. things that no one can prove will never happen
4. things that might have happened, but there seems to be no record of their happening
5. things that no one can prove cannot happen
6. anything that anyone cannot disprove
Everything else can be proven or disproven - perhaps not with current methodologies yet, but we'll get to it.
In other words, it'll happen.
2007-05-09 16:09:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by elmina 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
What's wrong with not knowing? I'm perfectly content with the idea that we live in a really huge scary universe and there are things that we can't really comprehend right now. I mean, we have the vantage point of ONE planet, with limited ways of even exploring this one place. What's wrong with just patiently waiting for people who actually spend their lives pursuing this knowledge to tell us what they discovered and praise them rather than stoning them because they didn't give you the answer you made up on your own? Just my 2 cents. : )
2007-05-09 16:04:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by <Sweet-Innocence> 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's probably true that every occurence happens according to physical laws. Only if there is something intelligent controlling those laws could something physically impossible happen. Our ability to observe, understand, and communicate about phenomena is and always will be incomplete.
2007-05-09 15:59:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes to the first and no to the second. Even paranormal phenomenon could be classified under 'physics'/
2007-05-09 16:01:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Canadian Time Traveler 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Everything is not explainable via science or human reasoning.
Pastor Art
2007-05-09 16:02:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes it is true that everything could be explained threw science
2007-05-09 16:00:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kosherpig 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
perhaps it would be if we were that scientifically advanced, who says we know all there is to know?
2007-05-09 16:00:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by happy_kko 4
·
1⤊
0⤋