English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please include supporting scripture with your answers. Thanks.

2007-05-09 13:21:07 · 11 answers · asked by Dr. G™ 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

when you are lead by the spirit to do something, and don't.

2007-05-09 13:29:43 · answer #1 · answered by Hannah's Grandpa 7 · 1 0

Omission
(Latin omittere, to lay aside, to pass away).

"Omission" is here taken to be the failure to do something one can and ought to do. If this happens advertently and freely a sin is committed. Moralists took pains formerly to show that the inaction implied in an omission was quite compatible with a breach of the moral law, for it is not merely because a person here and now does nothing that he offends, but because he neglects to act under circumstances in which he can and ought to act. The degree of guilt incurred by an omission is measured like that attaching to sins of commission, by the dignity of the virtue and the magnitude of the precept to which the omission is opposed as well as the amount of deliberation. In general, according to St. Thomas, the sin of omission consisting as it does in a leaving out of good is less grievous than a sin of commission which involves a positive taking up with evil. There are, of course, cases in which on account of the special subject matter and circumstances it may happen that an omission is more heinous. It may be asked at what time one incurs the guilt of a sin of omission in case he fails to do something which he is unable to do, by reason of a cause for which he is entirely responsible. For instance, if a person fails to perform a duty in the morning as a result of becoming inebriated the previous night. The guilt is not incurred at the time the duty should be performed because while intoxicated he is incapable of moral guilt. The answer seems to be that he becomes responsible for the omission when having sufficiently foreseen that his neglect will follow upon his intoxication he does nevertheless surrender himself to his craving for liquor.

St. Paul refers to this sin directly when he states "For I do not do the good I want..." (Romans 7:19)

2007-05-09 13:46:54 · answer #2 · answered by COMET 2 · 0 0

Sins of omission is when you fail to do something that you should have, like not confessing a sin, omitting it in your prayers.

Examples would be Matt. 5:14-16 and John 15:1-4

2007-05-09 13:31:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ahhh to comprehend this you need to comprehend the various different style of historic information/myths. 1st a different occasion. An Indigenous team could have a historic declare to somewhat land in line with a myths asserting that they were there considering introduction. this could fluctuate from the Archaeological checklist that have the potential to indicate that this team could have been there for 1000 years or so, however the info confirmed different cultural communities lived there earlier then. consequently equals conflict between respecting the Indigenous delusion and the historic info. Now. there is the Xian checklist to indicate sin originated in Eden, however the different Abrahambic Faiths additionally share those thoughts and function a different concept of Sin. So what i'm asserting that, on a similar time as your question is a sturdy one, there'll be conflict between the Bible checklist and the socio-historic version of actuality. conflict between the declare the two Jesus and Eden citizens have been the 1st to realize it. .

2016-11-26 22:57:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm not certain that the term itself can be found in Scripture, but the basic meaning goes like this:

Just as it is a sin to knowingly do something morally wrong, it is also a sin to see the opportunity to do something good and just ignore it. (aka letting a homeless person freeze when you have a second coat)

2007-05-09 13:29:52 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Sorry I don't do chapter & verse but anyway sins of omission consists of things you should have done as a Christian and didn't do,as opposed to sins of commission which is stuff that you did do that you as a Christian should not have done. in both cases we're not talking traditions or anything just things that are bad enough to qualify as sin meaning a very serious infraction of your obligations as a person who has given himself to Christ.

2007-05-09 13:29:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Omitting to care about others.
Mat 25 41-43 Then the King will turn to those on the left and say, "Away with you, you cursed ones, into the eternal fire prepared for the Devil and his demons! For I was hungry, and you disn't feed me. I was thirsty, and you didn't give me anything to drink. I was a stranger, and you didn't invite me into your home. I was naked, and you gave me no clothing. I was sick and in prison, and you didn't visit me."

2007-05-09 13:34:59 · answer #7 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0 0

Not doing something that you are supposed to do.

Take your pick of Scriptures for that.

2007-05-09 13:26:58 · answer #8 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0 0

i don't have scripture for it but i believe it's sins you forget to repent. i could be wrong.

2007-05-09 13:26:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nonsense made up by the catholic church that the other christian sects retained when the branched off.

Love and blessings Don

2007-05-09 13:27:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers