English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

You are talking "Apples vs oranges and pears" here.

Modbus and Profibus are both protocols, ways of encoding information for messages. It is like a language for computers to speak to one-another.

RS-232 is a physical form of connections that can be used to send electrical messages. It is an older technique that is unbalanced with respect to ground (one hot wire that goes between maximum voltage and zero to represent ones and zeroes and one ground wire for its reference) to carry the voltages. It has a limit (hundred feet or so) as to how far the messages can travel before the signals get to be so small that they are overwhelmed by noise on the line.

RS-485 is another physical form of connections that can be used to send electrical messages. It is a newer technique that is balanced with respect to ground (one hot wire goes up in voltage for a signal for ones while the other goes down for the same one and then does the opposite for a zero). It can be used to send signals for a few thousand feet because of its better immunity to noise on the lines.

SCADA is a popular way of arranging networks of sensors and actuators for collecting information from remote units and sending those remote units instructions as to how to react. Typically there is a graphical operator interface where humans can review that info and make decisions. A SCADA network can be linked using a variety of protocols and physical ways of sending ones and zeroes.

2007-05-09 11:55:14 · answer #1 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 1 0

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
what's the similarities and differences between modbus,profibus, rs-232 and rs-485(SCADA)?

2015-08-13 10:23:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Modbus Vs Profibus

2016-11-04 05:03:40 · answer #3 · answered by bassage 4 · 0 0

South Africa's apartheid involved White rule over the black, Indian, and mixed race populations. [Indians had immigrated to SA to work.] All these populations were part of South Africa. In Israel, the Israelis conquered West Bank and Gaza Strip in a defensive war, and maintained control of them in an effort to prevent more attacks on Israel. These lands were never considered as part of Israel. Israel itself had and has, citizens of every ethnicity and religion, including a large minority of Arab (Palestinian) Muslims. These citizens all have equality under the law. West Bank and Gaza are not part of Israel, and their people are not Israeli citizens. BTW all Jews have been expelled from Gaza. The Black "nations" in South Africa were never offered independence. Israel has long encouraged the formation of an independent Palestinian state from West Bank and Gaza. But they ask that the state recognize Israel as a state too. So far, Palestinian leaders have not been willing to say that Israel is a state. Most Palestinian leaders maintain that all of Israel should belong to "Palestine," whenever Palestine shall be founded. Israel cannot agree to this. Blacks had lived in South Africa since time immemorial, while Whites had immigrated there in the last few centuries. Jews had lived in Palestine from time immemorial, before it was ever called Palestine. Arabs had lived there for many centuries too. Islam wasn't founded until the 600s AD, so Islam is a late-comer to the region, relatively speaking. Christians had lived there since 30 AD, more or less. Christianity is not a race, of course; but then neither is Judaism. And technically, neither is Arabism, it's an ethnicity.

2016-03-14 13:11:39 · answer #4 · answered by Martha 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers