Is it standard for Vets to deny medications for a life-threatning illness. We found he just killed a dog?

Question

For approx 4 mths, our 11 lb dog has had seizures, bleeding, and rushed in for severe life-threating allergies. We have finally found an antibiotic that clears all her of all symptoms. The vet refuses to give her this life-saving med until he does a weekly CBC which always points to a high infection, only then will he issue the meds. I cried and begged to please give her more than a weeks worth of meds before running the same test that point to a huge infection, he says NO. He said he will refer her to a specialist after 1 MORE TEST, but that was a month ago.

We are going to another vet, hopefully he'll find the source of infection, but give her meds until they find out the source of infection. Isn't there some kind of humane law for denying life-saving meds for a chronic condition, & not trying to find what the condition is? Please feel free to e-mail me. I have all my bills together, along w/ pictures. She goes from a healthy-boucing dog to swollen & gasping for breath.

Answer 1

Theres something there, either the meds will mask the infection hes looking for to treat. i personally would goto another vet and ask more questions..hopefully get a vet that will explain what they want to do better..your doing the right thing. and you cant bring the vet on charges., i dont think .you dont have to except his treatments. as long as hes not causing the problems...wich are already there..i dont think theres much you can do. remember if you get good service you tell 5-6 friends...you get bad service, you tell everybody

Answer 2

hi- i'm sorry to take heed to approximately your domestic dogs ailment. It extremely seems such as you ought to apply a 2d opinion - there isn't something incorrect with that! Your veterinarian is right in doing tests in the previous allotting drugs. some drugs would reason different issues internally, and that's probably why he/she is requiring those tests. additionally, antibiotics would nicely be very costly - in the event that they are actually not likely helping the problem, merely protecting the indicators, it may be pointless to proceed. What your veterinarian is doing isn't unlawful. extremely, he must be saving your pooch from different issues by ability of not over-medicating her. good good fortune - are not getting annoyed. Vet's jobs are very difficult via fact animals can't communicate!!

Answer 3

I doubt there are any laws regarding your situation, and I also suspect that you are over reacting here. Each vet, like each doctor in the world determines what he will or will not do in a given situation, and that is their right. Did you ask the vet why he didn't want to do as you asked? I suspect you did and just didn't like his reasoning. He isn't being inhumane, he is simply sticking to his own code of ethics. By all means consult as many other vets as you wish, but don't call them inhumane because they are cautious in treatment.