A case in point chuck giampa had mayweather winning by a couple of points,assuming he was correct that pbf outboxed odlh,then in another fight penalosa vs ponce deleon he scored it 119-109 for deleon when it was very apparent that penalosa outboxed his opponent who was just aggresive like odlh
2007-05-09 03:40:31 · 4 answers · asked by jcns 2 in Sports ➔ Boxing
Boxing, it seems, has had a long history of corruption. Be it from fixed fights, bribed judges and referees, or having a fighter take a dive. So in answer to your question, yes, there is some truth to your belief.
2007-05-09 09:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Leroy H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has some bias, it is difficult to overcome your personal feelings. However, the judges are looking at the fight from 3 different views, so they may not see the same action as each other, especially when the fighters are against the ropes or in a corner.
2007-05-09 13:10:21 · answer #2 · answered by lestermount 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are so right!!!! depends on who judges. keep in mind that there is aggression and there is effective aggression!
2007-05-11 00:43:23 · answer #3 · answered by leslie b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF JUDGES TRIED TO BE MORE OBJECTIVE THEY COULD BE BETTER.
2007-05-09 13:42:31 · answer #4 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋