all this stuff he's claiming seems to at least deserve a look but everything i read or see says that noone's taking him very seriously..........why??
2007-05-09 00:39:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Here's one exapmle of something worth looking at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNeshiY4ixI&mode=related&search=
2007-05-09 00:45:06 · update #1
althought who's to say there's not a battery in there, but that's why someone should have a look
2007-05-09 00:47:56 · update #2
this video shows his anti gravity experiments and they can't be just filming something dropping while holding the camera upside down:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BR8Ac7hxbg&mode=related&search=
so if he is faking it all he's putting alot of effort in
2007-05-10 01:28:17 · update #3
Might be useful if you posted a link so that we can see if 'all this stuff he's claiming' is legit or not.
Meantime, look at this:
"Hutchison has offered videos (some for sale on his website) showing the levitation effect, but they are widely considered hoaxes. Some show a toy UFO gyrating wildly in the air. When it was pointed out that a wire or string was supporting the toy, Hutchison claimed it was a power supply. Other videos show objects suddenly flying upwards and never coming back down. These are all consistent with objects falling from an upside-down stage filmed with an upside-down video camera."
Hmmmmm....
2007-05-09 00:43:56 · answer #1 · answered by Superdog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After viewing the You-Tube stuff, I have come to the conclusion that the man is more a performance artist than a scientist. And I have to say that I agree with him if the premise is that we only believe something when it is "scientifically proven" in the same way that, historically, we have only believed what the Priests (of whatever religion) told us.
We have replaced traditional religions with The Great God Science.
Anyway, that's what I think will transpire.
2007-05-09 08:23:33 · answer #2 · answered by The Dalai Farmer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They did, but he has consistently failed to demonstrate anything in front of observers and nobody has been able to reproduce his results. He seems to be uninterested in working with any qualified observer and just sells unconvincing film of his experiments. He usually blames any failure on a government conspiracy to discredit him.
2007-05-09 07:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
John has to take them seriously first.
2007-05-09 07:43:23 · answer #4 · answered by James 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of his claims have any proof to them
2007-05-09 07:59:32 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋