What is the dividing line between pro-life and pro-choice?

Question

I am not sure which category I fit in. I find that abortion used in such a way as birth control is morally wrong, but at the same time I do realize that without abortion people will seek out means to abort the child themselves which will cause both harm to the mother and the baby. This is one of the reasons why I support abortion despite that I find the entire procedure to be murderous.

I also believe that in the event that the mother is at risk of death, or that the baby is at risk of severe deformity that abortion is likewise moral.

I find that the term pro choice seems to be a bit liberal for me as I see abortion used in ways of birth control as murder of a potential developed human being. Yet, I do not quite fit the profile of a pro life advocate.. Is there a middle ground?

Answer 1

The dividing line is exactly when you admit that a foetus is a human being. Some say the foetus becomes human after three months, some say at six months, and some maniacs say that it is not human even when its head is poking out (thus the debate about partial birth abortions). The Church teaches that a human life starts at conception. This position makes the most sense to me because there are no logical criteria to postpone the "transformation" to a later date. Once you identify when you have a human life, you must conclude that an abortion performed after that point is murder - the intentional destruction of a human life. By the way, 99.99% of pregnancies pose no risk to the mother's health, so don't get distracted by that argument.

Answer 2

to get the term right they are Pro-abort. They offer no help for the mothers that abort out of fear of not having baby items, they offoer no help to women that abort because of the fears of what the father of the baby or parents may say, they offer no support to help provide to laws to protect them from discrimination because they are pregnant, and the lis goes on and on. The baby in the womb is a living human being, the heart is beating even before the mother knows she is pregnant.
The Crisis Pregnancy Centers offer help and show accurate fetal developement information, yet the pro-aborts complain about it. The underlying problem is the root of all evil is the love of money and the abortion industry is a billon dollar a year corporation.

Answer 3

I believe there is a middle ground and that I fit into it as well.
I believe that since people are not likely to stop having abortions, that there should be safe places for them to do it.
I think that anyone going to have an abortion should have to have a few sessions with a counselor.
This person would be unbiased, but would tell the women (and men if they are with them) about all the available choices, possibly consequences and the emotional effects of each of the choices.

Answer 4

Yes. Most 'pro-choice' people do follow a middle ground. The Episcopal Church says that abortion is a tragic things but permissible in the case of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. I personally believe that it is also an act of loving mercy to abort a child that will be severely deformed.

Answer 5

Of course there is a "middle ground." Always remember when your best choice doesn't fit into either of two alternatives, it's probably the alternatives that are wrong, not you.

ESPECIALLY in politics.

(I find the term "pro-choice" particularly insulting. I've NEVER known a woman who got an abortion because she felt she had a CHOICE.)

Answer 6

One only has to be pro-life, and nothing more. One doesn't have to reach the level of being 'pro-choice' in the first place if there's no entertaining of 'second thoughts'. It's all a matter of being responsible individuals with foresight. But of course it's a different matter entirely if a medical emergency is imminent.

Answer 7

The real dividing line between pro-lifers and pro-choicers is their differing beliefs as to when human life begins. Pro-lifers tend to believe that human life starts at conception, or when the sperm fertilizes the egg; pro-choicers tend to believe that human life starts later, whether when the baby is born, or fully formed in the womb, or when it's able to survive on its own outside of the mother.

Answer 8

yes same here.....i wouldn't judge others but i would never abort if i got pregnant out of carelessness (i have a beautiful baby now :D)..but yes,if the mother's life is in danger,i guess that cannot be helped...also,if a person was raped,i don't think anyone should judge her because only SHE knows what she's going through....but it would be nice if people don't abort merely because they got pregnant out of carelessness

just my opinion.....i wouldn't give it unless asked though.

Answer 9

The same thin line between murder and not killing.

There can be no middle ground here. I do believe there are the rare medical necessities for it... but it is typically done out of a life-style choice. This is murder and it is wrong.

Answer 10

i do no longer think of that there is something difficult on the subject of the pro-decision place. i think interior the Roe v Wade decision states my ideals: Roe v. Wade is the historic ultimate courtroom decision overturning a Texas interpretation of abortion regulation and making abortion criminal contained in usa. The Roe v. Wade decision held that a woman, together with her surgeon, ought to decide for abortion in earlier months of being pregnant with out restrict, and with regulations in later months, based on the main outstanding to privateness. All state regulations proscribing women's get admission to to abortions in the time of the 1st trimester of being pregnant have been invalidated by Roe v. Wade. State regulations proscribing such get admission to in the time of the 2d trimester have been upheld in basic terms while the regulations have been for the objective of preserving the well being of the pregnant lady. Roe v. Wade legalized abortion contained in usa, which grew to become into no longer criminal in any respect in many states and grew to become into constrained by regulation in others. foundation of the Roe v. Wade decision: Roe v. Wade grew to become into desperate commonly on the 9th modification to usa shape, an element of the bill of Rights. The courtroom's decision hence grew to become into that the 9th modification, in declaring that "the enumeration interior the form, of specific rights, shall no longer be construed to disclaim or disparage others retained by the folk," risk-free someone's precise to privateness. (a) For the point only before approximately the top of the 1st trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation ought to be left to the scientific judgment of the pregnant lady's attending well being care expert. (b) For the point next to approximately the top of the 1st trimester, the State, in merchandising its interest interior the well being of the mummy, might, if it chooses, adjust the abortion technique in techniques that are fairly related to maternal well being. (c) For the point next to viability, the State in merchandising its interest interior the potentiality of human lifestyles might, if it chooses, adjust, or maybe proscribe, abortion different than the place it somewhat is needed, in suitable scientific judgment, for the maintenance of the lifestyles or well being of the mummy.