Question to Mormons and even Ex-Mormons?

Question

If you have already, or were to ever leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which would you join next and why? Or would you join any? Please give reasons why you chose or would choose what you did.

Personally, if I ever left, there would be nothing else for me. I KNOW this church is the true church, if I fell away, I would still know in my heart the church was true and so I would not be able to affiliate my self with anything else.

Answer 1

I'm honestly not sure. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints has meant so much to me, and to my family. I know there are several who will respond to this post with detest and criticism, and others who will give me thumbs down, things like that, but this Church is true to me. Without it, I don't know where I would be, or where I'd go. I can't begin to express with words how it has blessed me.

People can hate and disagree with my beliefs all they want to. But I really hope they can understand and respect the fact that it has brought me happiness and fulfillment in life. The same way their beliefs have with them. I wouldn't put them down for that. Ever.

But getting back to your question, I really don't know. It's not that I haven't looked at other beliefs and taken those beliefs to heart. I think it's really important to be open-minded. But all my questions lead me back to my Church. That's where I'm happy. I hope people can understand that, even if they don't agree with my beliefs.

Answer 2

Being that I was depressed and suicidal and couldn't find relief, I was a jack Mormon for sometimes and partied hardy, then I was a wiccan, then an atheist and then found Christianity (i did look for other churches in basic training, but found nothing) and found relief from my suidial thoughts when I got saved and excepted Jesus as my savior.
Reasons, I finally found peace, I finally gave into god and responded ot his call, I found out I could prophecy, I can chose were I want to work in the church, my church tells me were my tithing goes, I can actually pray for others, I actually healed someone, I have been healed myself of some things, I have had some incounters with God that I never had as a Mormon, the mormon bible did nothing for me, the christian bible has helped me so much in my life!!! God has talked ot me in dreams, I can go on, but I won't, ect.

Answer 3

I feel the same, at least as far as Christianity is concerned. I've done the Protestant thing, and the evangelical/pentecostal/charismatic stuff was WAY too scary, maybe I'd consider Catholicism, except much of it is not Biblical.

I'd say I'd probably go with one of the earth-based pagan beliefs.

But, that's never gonna happen cause I will never leave the LDS church.

Answer 4

I like to believe whatever I choose to beleive. The LDS church has some of my beliefs but not all, before I changed my beliefs to whatever the church taught, and now I realize that is what I was doing. Some of the things the LDS church teaches I do not believe.
I like the Unitarian Universalist church, and I am looking into the Bahai faith. For right now I am following what I believe and so far no church/religion fits into that.

Answer 5

That is a good question. The bigger question is why replace one church with another. Why not look inside and question yourself and discover what you really believe and who you really are, not what some group of people tell you to believe, and then search out those who are similar to yourself, beit a church or not.

Answer 6

Do you really believe you will be a god of a planet one day?
That is what Mormons believe is it not? That you will be Gods.. I don't think so..

Answer 7

The book of Mormon was made up. It is a forgery, not an ancient text. There is no history or archeology to back it up. The author lied which can be proven from recent history. He changed his story back and forth about how he supposedly found the golden tablets. He is lying.
----------------------------

MORMONISM
A Latter Day Deception

by Martin Wishnatsky

Origins of the Book of Mormon

One item I wished to examine at Princeton was a manuscript by one Solomon Spaulding entitled The Manuscript Found. During the early days of the Mormon church, a number of individuals had claimed that the Book of Mormon was a revised plagiarism of a mock-biblical novel written by a Dartmouth-educated former minister — Solomon Spaulding. Spaulding died in 1816 and, the story goes, his novel was stolen or copied by the young minister Sidney Rigdon, who teamed up with Joseph Smith to found a new religion based upon this eloquent document. The Mormons exulted when a Spaulding MSS. came to light in the late nineteenth century and, to their eyes, had no relation to the Book of Mormon, therefore proving the Spaulding theory the baseless invention of anti-Mormons.

I wanted to judge for myself. Princeton had a copy of the MSS. on microfilm. After reading a few pages I knew two things. First, this was not the MSS. of the Book of Mormon. Second, the author of the Book of Mormon wrote this MSS. Characters, plot, structure, style, names and religious content all paralleled the Book of Mormon. As one Hardy boys mystery is similar to another, so Spaulding's The Manuscript Found is similar to the Book of Mormon.

One of the devices Joseph Smith employed in "translating" the Book of Mormon hieroglyphics he found on the golden plates delivered to him by the angel Moroni was a peepstone. He placed the oracular rock in a hat, buried his face in the hat, and read the translation written on the peepstone. The peepstone was later preserved as a prophetic relic. According to David Whitmer, one of the three "witnesses" of the golden plates, "God gave to Brother Joseph the gift to see the sentences in English when he looked into the hat in which was placed the stone." In Solomon Spaulding's The Manuscript Found is the following passage: "Hamack then arose and in his hand he held a stone which he pronounced transparent. Through this he could view things present and things to come. Such was the clearness of his sight, when this transparent stone was placed before his eyes. He looked firmly and steadfastly on the stone and raised his prophetic voice."

An original Book of Mormon manuscript from which the first edition was published in 1830 is still in existence. Mormon scholars have identified the changing handwriting in the manuscript with the various scribes Joseph Smith employed in the process of "translation." One section, however, is still a mystery to Church historians and is attributed by them to "the unidentified scribe." One researcher into the history of the Book of Mormon, having developed a great familiarity with Solomon Spaulding's handwriting, saw a reproduction of the portion of the original Book of Mormon manuscript attributed to "the unidentified scribe" in a Mormon publication. "What is Spaulding's handwriting doing here?" he exclaimed.

The many challenges — doctrinal, historical and literary — to Joseph Smith's claims for the Book of Mormon wearied him as a cloud of gnats does an elephant. At the dedication of the Nauvoo, Illinois temple, he produced a copy of the original manuscript to place in the cornerstone. "I've had more than enough trouble with this thing," one astonished onlooker heard him say.

More What?

When one scholar pointed out that the word "Mormon" was the same as the Greek word for "monster" ("mormo"), the prophet haughtily announced that "Mormon" was a hybrid word, part English and part Egyptian. The Egyptian word for "good" was "mon", he explained. Therefore, "Mormon" actually meant "more good."

The Prophet Translates More Ancient Writings

An English minister visited Nauvoo displaying an antique-looking manuscript containing non-English characters. He asked Joseph Smith if he could decipher them. The prophet informed him that the document was "a dictionary of Egyptian hieroglyphics, identical to those he had translated from the golden plates." The manuscript was actually a Greek version of the Psalms of David - presented on aged and moldy parchment to test the Prophet.

The Kinderhook Plates. Along the same lines, a group of Illinois citizens etched some plates with acid to represent ancient writing and buried them with some bones in the vicinity of Kinderhook, Illinois. They then announced their find and called for the Prophet to translate. In his journal Smith's scribe at the time recorded that "President J. has translated a portion of them, and finds they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth."

One of the original Kinderhook plates has survived to the present time. Metallurgical tests have established that it was a hoax. The results appear in the Mormon Church magazine, the Ensign, of August,1981.

The Book of Abraham. In 1841, Joseph Smith began to publish his translation of the Book of Abraham, an Egyptian scroll found in one of two coffins containing Egyptian mummies purchased and placed on display by the Mormons as a tourist attraction. This scroll is also extant. By the early twentieth century, trained Egyptologists had declared that Smith's "translation" bore no resemblance to the funerary inscriptions on the scroll. The Church leadership in Salt Lake City, desirous of dispelling skepticism about Smith's translation, recently asked a reputable Mormon Egyptologist to examine the original. He declared the translation a fake and was excommunicated. The current Church position is that the text of the Book of Abraham, part of the canon of scripture, was given by "inspiration" and therefore need not conform to the document from which it was "translated".

Life on Other Planets

When not laboring over ancient texts, Smith on occasion disclosed truths by inspiration that were beyond the capacity of ordinary mortals to uncover. A diary of one of his associates, Oliver N. Huntington, contains a record of the following utterance by the Prophet: "The inhabitants of the moon are more of a uniform size than the inhabitants of the earth, being about six feet in height. They dress very much like the Quaker style . . . ." Many years later Brigham Young, remembering Joseph's words, asked a Sabbath assembly: "Who can tell us of the inhabitants of this little planet that shines of an evening, called the moon?" Journal of Discourses 13:271.

Smith could see into heaven as well and observe the clothing worn there. "A man came to me in Kirtland," reads his journal, "and told me he had seen an angel, and described his dress. I told him he had seen no angel, and that there was no such dress in heaven." History of the Church V:14. Smith's vision extended not only to the moon and the heavens but to the planets as well. Christ, he told a follower, had not only come to earth but had visited Mars, Venus and all the other planets — from Mercury to Pluto. "He gave us to understand,' wrote Benjamin F. Johnson, "that there were twelve kingdoms or planets, revolving around our solar system, to which the Lord gave an equal division of His time or ministry: that now was His time to again visit the earth."

Retranslating the Bible

One of the thirteen articles of faith of Mormonism that Mormon children memorize in Sunday school is the Mormon belief that the Bible is the word of God "if translated properly" and that the Book of Mormon is also the word of God. The Mormon leadership, therefore, is free to rewrite or "retranslate" the Bible as they see fit. For example, Joseph Smith "retranslated" Jesus' saying in the Sermon on the Mount: "Judge not lest ye be judged" as "Judge not unrighteously, but judge righteous judgment."

One morning in Sunday school, a studious member raised the question as to why the Book of Mormon, translated by Joseph Smith directly from the original golden plates inscribed by ancient American prophets, quoted Jesus as saying "Judge not lest ye be judged"? Wasn't the Book of Mormon a perfect translation "by the gift and power of God" and, therefore, unlike the Bible translations, beyond reproach? If so, why did not the words Joseph Smith corrected in the Bible not appear the same in the Book of Mormon? The teacher had no answer.

"That a quarter million of the human race," wrote J.H. Beadle in 1870, "should be led to stake their hopes for eternity on the divine authenticity of such a work, is one of the most melancholy evidences of the inherent weakness of the human intellect." Life in Utah, p. 255.