False, it is just the opposite.
2007-05-08 14:39:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vincent G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
False
2007-05-08 14:42:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by African 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
False
If Co2 increases for whatever reason, the natural response is hyperventilation or breathing more to get rid of that excess carbon dioxide. Increased CO2 causes alkylosis and your body will compensate by increased respirations.
2007-05-08 15:29:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Doc 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe it's true, but my intuition tells me that it's false. Since carbon dioxide in the blood displaces oxygen, your body begins to starve for oxygen; and it seems to me that under those circumstances the body would react instinctively by speeding up rather than slowing down your respiration.
2007-05-08 14:41:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
False.
http://www.whonamedit.com/synd.cfm/3172.html
2007-05-08 18:25:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
False: When CO2 increases, naturally the body wants to gets rid of it by hyperventilation, meaning heavy rapid breathing.
2007-05-08 16:16:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by kenneth h 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i imagine it ought to correctly be real. Deep and sluggish breaths oxygenates your blood more effective than short and quick ones. it really is because in a deep and sluggish breath you exhale each and each and every of the the air on your lungs and replace it with clean air, in spite of the indisputable fact that, in quick and short breath you in hassle-free words exhale the air on your bronchi and a small ratio of your lung. this way many of the carbon dioxide continues to be on your lung.
2016-11-26 20:32:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
false
2007-05-08 14:39:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Run for Pride 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
false. its just the opposite
2007-05-08 14:39:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by B-Mar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
false?
2007-05-08 14:38:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ○•Picasso•○ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋