should boxing be suspened after de la hoya was robbed?

Question

ok ive been all over the internet and 90% of people de la hoya was robbed.only a few clowns with no real knowledge or glasses think floyd won.too bad those same idiots happen to be ring side judges,anyhow seeing how oscar de la hoya is the face of boxing.should boxing be looked into again for corruption? i mean this isnt the only bad descion in boxing recently.there was also de la hoya trinidad,de la hoya mosley,de la hoya vs mayweather ,jones jr. vs tarver 1.and lennox lewis vs i forgott. and so on and so on.. idoiot replys will be reported.

Answer 1

You are one of the idiots that haven't watched a fight since Tyson fought Holyfield and all of the sudden you are a boxing expert.

Answer 2

Well report this idiot reply, aunt b, ant pee, whatever your name is...I've run into your questions about 10 times, and frankly instead of boxing being suspended, your account should be suspended for asking and whining about the same dumb s#!t. The fight is almost a week old, get over it. These are professional judges, and even they make mistakes, but they were at ringside while most of the world was at home watching the fight. If anybody else in here knows your posts, they know that you are racial and bitter...who knows, probably caught your mom with a black man. Ask some other kind of question, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is the current champ, everybody doesn't agree, but it is what it is. No matter how much you whine and complain, there ain't nuthin' you can do about it.

Answer 3

ok.... honestly, i was watching the fight, and was slightly pulling for de la hoya for the simple fact that he was the underdog. I have to say he fought a bad fight mentally, and didn't disserve the decision. I was sorta surprised it wasn't unanimous. I'm not saying that Mayweather kicked ***, because De La Hoya was active too. Mayweather just landed his jabs (which Oscar wouldn't throw for a while), had more energy, and overall, he fought smarter. De La Hoya had his shots, but they didn't land or do much damage, and he would get hit while recovering energy after these flurries.
If you wanna talk about a robbed decision, you should definately mention Quartey-Forrest. Quartey dominated the fight and continuosly landed punches. I had the fight 8-2 in the ten round bout, and the commentators agreed. somehow, the judges, who definitely got blazed before the fight, scored a unanimous decision for Forrest. that was bullsh*t.

Answer 4

First off, the worst decision of DeLa Hoya's career was the one that claimed Oscar beat Pernel Whitaker, the judges gave the fight to Oscar, even though Pernel won seven of 12 rounds on my card and knocked Oscar down in one of them. Yeah, Oscar won 7 of 12 against Tito, and got robbed, but the DeLa Hoya/Mayweather fight was scored as accurately as could be expected in a boring defensive oriented fight.

I had it even after eight a 4-4 split, then Oscar stopped jabbing and Floyd got 3 of the last 4 on my card. It was not a bad decision, it was fair.

Should boxing be suspended for a bad decison? Are you kidding me, of course not, but then, according to your question I am one of those idot's with no real knowledge who think Floyd won, so my opinion is of no importance.

Answer 5

suspended? no.

but i do believe the 3 judges should sit down and watch the fight over again.

im willing to be someone made a mistake somewhere along the fight at least in terms of scoring.

its happened before...i forget with who but later on the judges admitted it was a mistake and awarded the other boxer the win.

anyone remember who that was?

Answer 6

hey for those 90% of the people who said de la hoya should've won, well doesnt matter what u think cause he lost.haha. mayweather won and de la hoya fans have to get over the fact he LOST. and no one with real knowledge said mayweather won, bull sh it, he's the best pound-for-pound boxer, and hey de la hoya fans, get over it!!!! haha i totally agree with blogbaba

Answer 7

PBF WON BY DEC