is there any difference between Movefree advance and other glucosamine?

Answer 1

Move free advance is far superior to glucosamine, because it contains MSM, Uniflex, a dual bioflavonoid antioxidant system, Hyaluronic Acid, a compound found naturally in synovial (joint) fluid. Joint Fluid sends signals to the body to repair the joints and manufacture more Hyaluronic Acid, thus helping to lubricate joints. Joint Fluid has been clinically shown to be absorbed directly into joints when orally ingested.

doctors are starting to use this product with their patients and finding very good results. I recommend you try this product.

Answer 2

Move Free Glucosamine

Answer 3

Yes, there is a difference. Movefree Advanced has dosages that are proven to NOT WORK.

For MSM: clinical studies show that you need a minimum dosage of 1500mg. There are two main studies that have been done on MSM - one with 1.5g that was not as effective as the 6g/day study. The versions of MoveFree I have seen only have 1.5g per dose.

CHONDROITIN: Studies show that 800mg is the minimum effective dosage. One study was done on Chondroitin with 200mg - and it didn't work. Schiff uses only 200mg.

GLUCOSAMINE: Schiff uses a form of Glucosamine HCl that is not effective. The Glucosamine HCl that was used in the NIH-GAIT study is not the same as what they use, so even if they are putting the recommended 1500mg - it is not the right form, so it won't work.

UNIFLEX - has NO clinical studies

**Furthermore, as if you can't tell that I would never take a Schiff product, did you know that Schiff failed to recall earlier products that had only 1% of label claim for chondroitin? - bad company, bad business.

Answer 4

I reviewed some of the research that is found on the MoveFree website. Much of the research is sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, is not peer-reviewed, is conducted on non-human subjects, etc. You must take their claims with a grain of salt. Their aim is to sell their product. The research they quote is not always the most reliable and can often be twisted to fit what they want to say, especially if those that own the company who manufactures the product participate or contribute to the studies especially those that fund it. One of the studies on the site was done by the NIH and looks promising. However, if you dig a little deeper the primary investigator has ties to both Pfizer and McNeil.