Does only vetoing 2 bills in 7 years mean that George W. Bush is still "MISSING IN ACTION"?!!!?

Question

We are outraged that the Iraqi government is going to take off for 2 solid months this summer while our brave and valiant soldiers will continue to give their lives in battle during that same period!

But wait a minute here!

How much time has our BLUNDERER-IN-CHIEF spent on that ranch of his in Crawford?

How often does that cowardly LEMON-IN-CHIEF sneak off to that ranch of his in Crawford, Texas while soldiers continue to die in battle in Iraq?

The Iraqi government is going to be MISSING IN ACTION for two months this summer.

In George W. Bush, they have an excellent teacher who shows them how to be MISSING IN ACTION and get away with it.

Didn't all of the people who voted for George W. understand that there was plenty of evidence that he operated this way?

How can you tell that a Republican president has been MISSING IN ACTION?

Because, in 87 months as president, he has vetoed only two bills !!!!

How can we veto a presidency?!!! an AWOL IN CHIEF ?!!!

Answer 1

The lack of vetoes isn't proof that Bush vacations excessively (although he does) It's proof that the Republicans controlled Congress with an iron hand for the first 6 years of Bush's rule, and never sent him a bill he didn't like.

The list of bills Bush has vetoed is interesting - 1. federal funds for stem cell research, 2. bill which would end the war in Iraq, and coming soon 3. anti hate crimes legislation. Historians will see Bush as AWOL during national emergencies, and also as a cruel person.

Answer 2

Interesting little RANT tied in with your "question"...

President Bush had a cooperative Congress for the first 6 years and didn't NEED to veto.

Clinton had to work with a Republican majority Congress and made 36 vetoes...

See the BELOW like for the FACTS.

Answer 3

He does not necessarily have to be missing in action by being in Crawford. He has been missing in action mentally from birth.