the most amazing sexual partner in your life, but you had nothing in common with and fought constantly?
Difficulty: no cheating or masturbation.
2007-05-07 17:54:33 · 16 answers · asked by milvis23 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Being older I can see things maybe younger people don't. I would take the horrible lover if we get along. Later in life sex might die anyways so you need to be compatible in other areas. My husband has ED, we do other things, but I'd never trade him in on the hottest lover anywhere. We love each other so much and those feelings of closeness, lying in bed with my head on his chest just talking and hugging and kissing could never be replaced. Life is so much more than sex, but young people don't think so cause they haven't experienced different types of relationships yet. The person is much more important than the sex alone.
2007-05-07 18:00:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Would you rather have a horrible lover (no sexual pleasure at all) that you get along with no matter what or?
the most amazing sexual partner in your life, but you had nothing in common with and fought constantly?
You just described my first wife ( had it all wrapped up in one ) it was all relative to how much beer was consumed .
2007-05-07 18:03:08 · answer #2 · answered by brother_nature_2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. What a mind twister this is. I think I'd choose the amazing sexual partner. Because I could still have friendships with other people that I get along with, so that part of me would be satisfied elsewhere. But I would not like to live without sexual pleasure. So, yeah, give me the amazing one. LOL
2007-05-07 18:00:58 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've thought there always has been people who were lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God. Not necessarily everyone, but at least a few.
2016-05-18 00:15:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally .... If I had to make that choice I would Marry the Man I had NO sexual pleasure with what so ever... to have a *perfect* relationship....!!! With sex... well there is just so much "make up" sex you can have before it gets old... speaking of, one day you might just be too old to have sex, so wouldn't you want someone you could talk to, and just Be with... BUT Personally if it were ME, the No sex guy I married, would be Open to, an Open relationship...(open relationships are not cheating) seeing how people are Human and we have needs... sex doesn't always HAVE to be emotional! It can be Just phyical! .... and if that don't work... Why couldn't you Masterbate... what do you think they make toys for?!? Also... I think there is always a way to "make things work" just becuz the person you Love doesn't have the same sexual intrests as you, doesn't mean that you couldn't adapt to eachothers needs!
2007-05-07 18:04:58 · answer #5 · answered by ~*rOxY*~ 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A person you get along with great but is a horrible lover is usually a friend.
A person you have great sex with but nothing in common with is usually a fling or hookup.
2007-05-07 17:59:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather have someone I got along well with, than incredible sex, and constant drama. I HATE drama!. I have already had the good sex, earlier in my life. I'm looking for a good companion, now.
2007-05-07 18:00:51 · answer #7 · answered by Big hands Big feet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well why cant i have both?
the horrible lover would be my new friend. and the amazing sexual partner would be just that.
that is not cheating. nor is masterbation involved.
2007-05-07 18:04:30 · answer #8 · answered by miss lisa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can teach / learn good sexual technique and loving but i not sure how you teach / learn to get along with someone you dont get along with
2007-05-07 18:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, if i could masturbate, then yes...i would stick with the horrible lover. But, since i cant use my Rabbit....then no lol. just cant do it.
2007-05-07 17:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋