If it was for power then why hasent iran let any inspectors into the country to examine there so called "Nuclear Program".
If they are building nukes dont you think they would actually use them as a weapon of offensive use instead of defensive use?
Should we act against iran now?
And if we dont can you answer for the deaths of thousands?
2007-05-07 14:22:12 · 6 answers · asked by Proud Michigander 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why isnt anyone doing anything about iran?
If bush took action his approval rating in my mind would go from 0% to 60%
Do you agree?
2007-05-07 14:36:32 · update #1
I am going to give this one popular soveirnty, VOTE!
2007-05-10 12:26:50 · update #2
Who said iran didn't let inspectors in the nuclear program? hundreds of UN inspectors and cameras are watching iran nuclear program. iran has broke the record of inspectors controling a country's atomic plans. by the way as ahmadinejad said islam restricts killing civilians.
israel has tens of nukes but why no one (including you) asks about israel?
it is clear that iran only wants power, the UN never found anything going wrong. the only reason the west is opposing iran's nuclear program is that iran is advancing rapidly in technology, because both us and the west know iran will never go for nukes.
2007-05-08 20:48:20 · answer #1 · answered by persian nazi 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since there is nothing to prove the contrary,yes Iran's nuclear program is for peaceful purposes...Iran did let the IAEA to inspect the sites and they said that there is no evidence that Iran is building nukes.After the UN sanction Iran refused the inspections...Iran is not a threat,so there is no reason to attack it...
If they are building nukes I don't think they are ever going to use them...
2007-05-11 09:32:51 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no longer some thing about Iran's rhetoric and movements has been "non violent" accordingly a ideas. I bear in mind a information record showing the Iranian defense force marching in the type of a sword reducing by an American flag. The day earlier Ahmadinejad got here to u . s . a . about a month in the past, he gave a speech in Iran, status in the front of a banner that study, "demise To u . s . a .". Iran poses a probability that should be dealt with. he's a loose cannon.
2016-11-26 01:58:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't need to use nuclear weapons. They know this. They're not stupid. my question to them however would be if the United States returned to the silver and gold standard, would they be interested in denominating their oil in US dollars then? If of course it was backed by silver and gold?
No i don't agree. It would start a war we couldn't stop.
2007-05-07 14:35:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Refining the uranium, that they themselves are saying they are doing, to a grade in which you wouldnt use it in a reactor but it would only be used with weapons is well... rather obvious isnt it.
2007-05-07 14:33:39 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They want bombs that is the goal! next they will be working on a space program! Then the warheads will be going for a ride!!!
2007-05-07 14:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋