This is science and what counts is the data, not "logical" arguments.
"I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”
Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)
Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command
Here are two summaries of the mountain of data that convinced Admiral Truly, short and long.
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf
It's (mostly) not the sun:
http://www.stopglobalwarming.org/sgw_actionitems.asp
And the first graph aboves shows that the sun is responsible for about 10% of it. When someone says it's the sun they're saying that thousands of climatologists are stupid and don't look at the solar data. That's ridiculous.
Science is quite good about exposing bad science or hoaxes:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/polywater.html
There's a large number of people who agree that it is real and mostly caused by us, who are not liberals, environmentalists, stupid, or conceivably part of a "conspiracy". Just three examples of many:
"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."
Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart
"Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."
Senator John McCain, Republican, Arizona
“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."
Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont
There's a lot less controversy about this is the real world than there is on Yahoo answers:
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/329.php?nid=&id=&pnt=329&lb=hmpg1
And vastly less controversy in the scientific community than you might guess from the few skeptics talked about here:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686 and:
"There's a better scientific consensus on this [climate change] than on any issue I know - except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics. Global warming is almost a no-brainer at this point,You really can't find intelligent, quantitative arguments to make it go away."
Jerry Mahlman, NOAA
Good websites for more info:
http://profend.com/global-warming/
http://www.realclimate.org
"climate science from climate scientists"
2007-05-07 09:08:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
FACT OR FICTION
FICTION
for many North Americans ,but they are used to fiction and feel more comfortable with fairytales instead of the truth,
Many blindly believe that our fate is in Gods hands ,and their focus is on the beautifull heaven that awaits ,they are not to concerned with the world their children will inherrit
whilst others wish to enjoy an Earthly paradise ,with out having to die first,they care what happens here and want to help the planet
there may come a time that for the sake of our survival the two views will be seperated in to Enemies and friends of the planet
World leaders are not concerned with the well being of the masses ,on the contrary .it was stated at a conference in Copenhagen,in 1998,by Kissinger, that the Agenda demanded a decrease in the world population of 60%,and you cannot achieve this if you start saving everybody.
scientists who work for politicians ,get paid by these politicians and they have downplayed the facts because solutions are expensive and means change and change effects many peoples incomes,and upsets profit margins,so most of the world is kept in the dark of the real things that are going on.for political and economic reasons
HOWEVER CLIMATE CHANGE IS FACT FOR MILLIONS
Global warming is a very complex collection of many effects
this text only covers some aspects of global warming mainly man made desertification
industrial contamination ,the contaminating effects of the cities ,is another story
there are natural cycles in the planets life
but mans existance has its effects,and this is increasing with overpopulation,putting strains on Natural resources and increasing contaminations as well as destructions of essential componants the ensure living conditions for all life forms
in North Africa,India,Mexico ,millions of people are effected by land loss and desertification and some have died as a result
in china, thousands of what used to be farmers are running for their lives from the dust storms that have burried their towns and turned their lands into dessert,
,the Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year
and all of the desserts we know are a results of mans actions ,and they are increasing ,not getting less ,in the dinosaurs days ,there were very few desserts.
collectively this planet is drying up because of bad farming practices like,over grazing and fertilizers,
each degree rise in temperature means 10%crop loss
and there is less and less water (because of deforestation),to irrigate this production ,
and there are less and less farmers to do it..
and there are 70 million more peole every year that have to eat and drink and wash
who are overpumping deep carbon aquifiers
who are plowing more and more unstable lands because they have lost so many million hectares to desertification ,
because of bad farming practises ,such as using fertilizers and heavy machinary or over grazing
RISING SEAS
The northpole is melting ,and we will know it without ice in our life times.
this does not affect the sea level because it is ice that is already in the water.but the melting ice from Green land and the south pole ,are another matter.
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/natur...
if forrest are being exchanged for ashalt,concrete and desserts
what is gonna keep this planet habitable for us
We as humanity can behave in a less stressful manner as far as the Environment is concerned ,but it will mean global co operation between all countries ,and taking into account human nature and the world politics ,it is unlikely that this will happen, Source(s) Lester E Brown is the director and founder of the global institute of Environment in the United states .he has compiled a report based on all the satalite information available from NASA,and all the information that has
come from Universities and American embassies WORLD WIDE ,
his little book--a planet under stress , Plan B has been trans lated into many languages and won the best book award in 2003
2007-05-07 08:33:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It does. As to why I think so, it's just logic.
On the one hand, you have a virtual world-wide consensus of scientists, research organizations, universities, professional journals, etc. who have the expertise to gaterhand evaluate the evidence. And their findings are tha tglobal warming exists.
The "deniers" have no credibility--they offer oil company propaganda (usually trying to conceal the source), quotes from 1970s popular magazines about sceintific speculation at a time when that's all scientists had enough dat to do--speculate. Conspiracy theory websites. And continually bringing up points (e.g. volcanic eruptions) that they don't even know (because they never acutally STUDY th escience) scientists looked at years ago.
Now, which side does anyone with any sense believe?
2007-05-07 08:15:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
yes, they are plenty of facts to prove it. Ice Caps melting, global temeprature has risen a few degrees. Hotter winters and logner summers, check any news or anyone will tell u it exists
2007-05-07 07:49:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pat 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes. I think so because the average temperature of the Earth is rising. Whether it's caused by humans is another matter.
2007-05-07 07:50:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes. I think so because, I mean, hello. there's not supposed to be hurricanes where I live, but there was one, the first, EVER. Plus, I've watched that Al Gore movie.
2007-05-07 09:32:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by main_sister28 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gee, could this question be asked any more often? I must see this question in this form alone at least 100 times a day.
2007-05-07 08:39:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
global warming is "an untruthful convenience"
join the heresy
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170&hl=en
2007-05-07 09:20:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The environmentalist and your teacher has told u a lie. CO2 is the first part of our air recycle system . The plants need the CO2 as much as U need oxygen.
2007-05-07 08:54:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
2⤊
3⤋