We all have to reduce the number of kids we have.
2007-05-07 07:37:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by *~STEVIE~* *~B~* 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sadly us Brits are not having enough children and the muslims are having toooo many - they reckon to take over by having more of them soon than us - we should only pay child benefit for the first 3 children - after that all benefits should stop. That would make everyone use contraception and keep the population from over expansion, also necessary proper border controls, not like they are now - non-existent. US and Australia have it right, no visa, no entry, and deportation a certainty if caught!
2007-05-08 15:44:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by essdee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apocalypse very shortly. As most of the 60,000,000 Britons are concentrated around London and the South East, the weight of them will cause Kent and Sussex to sink into the sea. This will send a swell of warm water to the Arctic, which will have the consequence of melting the ice-cap faster. The loss of weight of the ice -cap will cause a shift in the earth's axis, so that the planet will wobble. Curently, this phenomenon is only being prevented by the anchoring effect of the megatons of Idaho potatoes being stored in Wichita waiting for their conversion into French Fries for McDonbuggerkingfc. Fortunately, as 1lb of McDon's contributes the same weight to each consumer, plus additional weight given to the atmosphere by the methane farted by the consumers, outweighs the inverse square law, we may escape apocalypse for enough time for the West Indies to conquer the world, which would then bring about an apocalypso.
2007-05-07 18:25:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
You know Chris, I am afraid that we might not reach 100 years. This coupled with global warming, posturing with Iran & North Korea and the constant threat of terrorism. What would our politicians do if there is another successful attack on US or UK soil? Who will they invade this time?**
2007-05-07 14:49:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ★Spotter★ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
A mass cleansing is what is needed, but that will never happen.
In all actuallity the world needs to take a stance similar to China, and limit families to one child. The days where you need a family of 5 to help run the farm are over. All breeding a family this size these days does is worsen the human toll on the planet.
2007-05-07 14:38:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dylan m 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Blame Blair/Brown/New Labour
2007-05-07 16:53:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by A True Gentleman 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well some of us in the US took that approach and reduced the number of children that we had (those of us with European ancestry) now we are being run over...
2007-05-07 14:42:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you better look at UN documents concerning 80-90% world population reduction.
2007-05-07 14:55:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
300 million in america. What percentage is that of the total? Now do you want us to be like china? hell no!
2007-05-07 14:47:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeb black 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are all sorts of threats to the planet which could quite well curb the growth you are concerned about.
At the rate the human race is killing each other and the planet your concerns may never reach manifestation.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-us%3AIE-Address&rlz=1I7SKPB&q=The+Facts+BBC+Global+Warming+&btnG=Search
2007-05-07 14:58:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jewel 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
gov scared of not looking PC enough maybe?,
Theres too many people in england now so i reckon gov should sterilise everyone with an IQ of less than 120 and breed out the brainless chav scroungers
2007-05-07 15:01:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
2⤋