Also does the bible mention anything to do with how creatures evolve in accordance to their habitat?
2007-05-07 05:14:58 · 11 answers · asked by youronmyfoot 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Odds are pretty good that Keith Richards was.
2007-05-07 05:19:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Humans on the ark:
-Noah
-Noah's wife (name unknown)
-Noah's sons: Shem, Ham, and Yafet
-Shem, Ham, and Yafet's wives (again, names unknown)
As for the second question: the Bible seems to imply (somewhere in Psalms) that the habitats were made for the animals, not the other way around. That's not to say creatures never evolved; it's just that God had in mind their final forms before creating the landscape.
2007-05-07 20:13:58 · answer #2 · answered by Melanie Mue 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Noah, Noah's wife, Noah's 3 sons and Noah's 3 daughter-in-laws.
The Bible doesn't have to mention this. Man has always known that environment has many predictions. God taught this best with the children of Israel as His chosen people. He warned them not to let the Canaanites persuade them to worship their gods. God even said don't put any other gods before Him because there are no gods but Him. God wanted man to know that he can be influenced if he gets around evil. Man has always known the fisherman is tanned because he is out in the sun and the cave dweller is light skinned because he stays deep inside the cave. If you sit behind a desk you will have small arms. If you lift boxes for a living you will have large arms. God made each kind after its own kind. It can be tanned or not. It can be small or large.
2007-05-07 12:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Deke, while your answer is not Biblical it is hysterical! Gotta love it, he's old enogh to have been on the ark isn't he?
There were 8 people on the ark. The Bible says that each creature has children that are the same species as their parents. This is supported by science, as there is no evidence of any species giving birth to a creature of ANTOHER species, however there is great variation WITHIN a species.
2007-05-07 12:23:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives, no one else.
The Bible does not say how the animals adapted to the new habitats. You must remember that every thing was destroyed, there were no trees at that time, just grass. Then after a few years there would be brush and then trees several years after that.
2007-05-07 12:21:36 · answer #5 · answered by tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans other than who?
I am not aware of The Bible specifically mentioning that evolution was tied to habitat; and suppose that due to it's silence on this and other matters, I guess that we are left to figure that part out for ourselves, eh? ;-)
Regards,
2007-05-07 12:27:20 · answer #6 · answered by smithgiant 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It mentions that there were at least another 70 people on the Ark, none of whom helped in the re-procreation of the world.
2007-05-07 12:19:50 · answer #7 · answered by Maverick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bible leaves many people including the most devout Christians with more unanswered questions than not.
2007-05-07 12:20:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You think that after all of the inbreeding after adam and eve, noah would have the brains to build an arc? I dont think so. Its fake man, sort your life out.
2007-05-07 12:19:25 · answer #9 · answered by john 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes a fish can not grow bigger than the bowl he is swimming in.
2007-05-07 12:20:05 · answer #10 · answered by gjmb1960 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋