well first of all What is the nature of God?He is for the poor and down trodden.He is for the sick and He sat with the thieves and prostitutes not the religious hierarchy.He was with the people who had leprosy.In today's society that would be the people with aids.Bare with me I am painting a picture.He would be against the death penalty because He said may He who is without sin cast the first stone and healed the man with 6000 demons in him.Drug usage is demonic so the prisons would be almost empty and care facilities would be opened to treat people with drug problems.Rehabilitation centers.He walked with the people.He did not sit on a pedestal giving orders.The picture is getting into focus now.He let people choose which way to go.So he would be against abortion but not make it against the law to choose.He said to forgive your brothers wrongs.And He was against killing.So there would not be a war.Katrina victims would have been helped immediately.It is getting crystal clear now.There would be an equality in taxes the rich and poor would pay the same rate.Because He said Give unto Cesar what is Cesars and give unto God what is God's.I think this is the end of the story What political party does this sound like to you?
2007-05-06 22:16:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would be a moderate, and His ideas would be a combination. That's what I think, anyway. He was socially conservative (there's no denying that), but fiscally, there's just no way to know. I think He would have combined some fiscally liberal aspects (like communism and socialism), with more conservative ideals.
I have the feeling He would be COMPLETELY fed up with the hypocrisy of both the Republicans AND the Democrats, and would vote neither.
2007-05-06 22:18:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Whichever one is against the current religious structure. Helps the poor and down trodden but at the same time if you can work then you work no free lunch for you. I'm sure hed be against war,abortion,and homosexuals to So probally some combination of conservative /socialist /democrat.
2007-05-06 22:31:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by alphaomegadisciple 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well you could say the Pharisees were right wing fundamentalist and the Sadducees were liberal higher critics and both groups favored his crucifiction so I guess a Libertarian
2007-05-06 22:23:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by GregT 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
In the first hand, Jesus had never fallen.
He came down from Heaven, with Heavenly 'nationality'. And there is only one Party in Heaven, tehe ruling one: The Believers' Party.
2007-05-06 22:26:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by autor06hj 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The bible reffers to him as the King of Kings he will be as a dictator but unlike any other dictator he will usher a world of righteousness where peace dwells there will be no tolerance for murder theft nothing which is corrupt.
2007-05-06 22:32:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Free Cuba 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A radical, following neither pattern.
Ever heard of the song "Secret Ambition"?
2007-05-06 22:26:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the middle....sometimes dem sometimes rep...but never communist nor facist.
2007-05-06 22:33:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by karen i 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He wouldn't be in any political spectrum.
2007-05-06 22:20:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would be extreme liberal. Well, that is 1970 years ago he was. Now he would be extreme conservative.
2007-05-06 22:24:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋