The universe is too big for us (we don't need the extra space). Isn't this the evidence of creation?

Question

In another word, the universe was not created for us, but by God and for God Himself, although we don't understand why God needs such a big space.

Answer 1

Whoever says there is no evidence of creation is a blind idiot. Is not every thought you conceive not creative? Whoever says the universe is here because of one all powerful being is just as big a closed minded idiot. All thought is creative.

We say the only constant is this universe is change but that is only half of the story. The other constant in this universe is creation. Man's biggest problem is he believes, for the most part, he is the only life in the universe. I can understand how primitive man can think this but modern man? Come on people!

If there are billions of creative beings on this planet then how many are there in the universe and growing? If you operate off the premise there is only creation in this universe and every being is a creative source while all experiences and knowledge is recorded through all of time then could this be why the universe is expanding?

You have to understand man has no clue about some very big questions such as: where does consciousness exist in the brain or even if it is of a physical nature. We can't fully explain why there is electricity. I like to look at the universe as a big infinite hard drive that creates its on space. The more data that is stored the more space you will need if the date is infinite.

What creates that data that expands the universe? All the sum of all the creative being recorded experiences and gained knowledge through out the universe.

I don't like God being the automatic default because man is stumped about how universe came to be. We can be more imaginaive than God created everything because this still leaves open how God came to be.

So yes agree the big universe is evidence of creation. I just do not believe it is because of a God.

Answer 2

There is no proof that any God did anything unless you accept that a God created the Mass and energy that caused the Big Bang. I would think it would be insulting to such a God if you would not believe that the God would know enough to perceive that the Big Bang began evolution. The God would also know the paths of evolution of every mote of that big Bang. Including the Earth and human beings amongst everything else in the universe.

Why do Christians underrate a God just to have a parable in a book accepted as a true happening?


If you want the Truth......Ask a Pagan.

Answer 3

Not to be pedantic, but you could just as easily use the fact that the universe is too big for us to be proof AGAINST creation. After all, God isn't very efficient if he wastes space like that. ;)

I'm just saying that "universe = big" doesn't prove anything either way. :)

Answer 4

i'm a deist and.. My own ideals in keeping with physics are as follows: massive bang started the universe. the large bang grew to become into led to by a quantum fluctuation. The quantum fluctuation grew to become into led to by a collision of seventh dimensional branes. i in my opinion assign those branes divinity via fact i think that something of a a techniques better length has divine, or god-like, features while in comparison with its decrease dimensions. you could ask... what?... in case you do no longer understand then look into the link approximately flatlanders. To a 2d being, us 3-D human beings are god-like.... to us 3-D products, the seventh dimensional branes are god-like.... it somewhat is in basic terms a short evaluate of my questioning.

Answer 5

No it's not evidence for creation. Have you ever bothered to think that maybe there are other life forms out there besides what is here on earth.

Answer 6

No. It just shows how big the universe is.

Answer 7

Do you know what the word evidence means?