Creationism has be PROVEN?

Question

There is a conspiracy among scientists to only pay attention to evidence that supports evolution and to ignore evidence that goes against it.

Did you know that they found tools and pottery that were dated to be about 50 million years old?

Also, if you look at a fossil of a shrimp that is tens of millions of years old, it looks EXACTLY the same as a modern shrimp.

The same thing goes for fish. They look the same too. They have not changed one bit.

The "theory" of evolution states that animals are CONSTANTLY evolving, so shrimp cannot look the same as they did millions and millions of years ago. You think the conditions were the same back then? Of course not.

So, logically speaking, the shrimp should have evolved, but they didn't. Why?

Because evolution is not true. You have to be an idiot to buy into that lie.

Agree?

Charleston Heston hosted this great documentary that proves creationism.

All you have to do is go to youtube and look up the video. It's really makes some good points.

Answer 1

How about this one: When a scientist sends a rock sample to be dated in a laboratory, he has to tell the lab about how old he thinks it is (in millions of years). Then the lab people keep playing with knobs until they get a result that supports it. And they use the forms of dating that are most likely to give an old age. Seems biased huh?

Answer 2

Well I look forward to the paper in Nature.

Where do you get these unsubstantiated claims? There is no 50 million year old pottery. There are some New Age guys that have made false claims that the Pyramids were that old, but that is the only thing that I can even find. If you want to read an interview: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/explore/howold2.html

There are clear differences in both shrimp and fish over ten million years. There are a few isolated species that have not changed much, just as there are a few species of turtles that have not changed much. There is nothing in evolution that requires any species to go extinct. It only says that there will be random changes and the best survivor will win. If one species is very fit to survive, then it has no pressure to change.

Answer 3

There is NO proof of creationism. If there was even any good evidence of creationism, then scientists wouldn't ignore it. Unlike what you seem to think, there's not a conspiracy amongst scientists to "prove" evolution and "disprove" creationism. That is completely against all scientific principals.
"There is no domain of human knowledge or endeavor that is more open to scrutiny than science; it is the very nature of science that it be honest, fair, and aboveboard, ready at all times to admit it's errors and revise it's theories, and when scientists are caught faking their laboratory results, in support of doubtful hypothesis, they know they have bought their careers a one-way ticket to oblivion. Without the checks on it's practices, science would be doomed to failure: serious researchers would be few and beleaguered, and we would have no polio vaccine, no space flights, no television, no computers, not even plastic garbage bags." (Tim M. Berra)
Scientists are always ready and willing to admit when they're wrong, or if a mistake has been made. Religion, on the other hand, will not. It will deliberately and consciously tip results to favor their beliefs, and ignore any and all results and evidence contrary to their beliefs.
And it is not a rule that any living thing absolutely HAS to evolve and CHANGE. The purpose of evolution is to help something better adapt to it's environment. If something is doing just fine in it's present state, then it won't evolve as much as things that need to adapt. There are a lot of creatures that look pretty much the same as they did a million years ago.

Answer 4

To debunk the theory of evolution by means of scientific evidence is without a doubt acceptable, however disproving it using creationism is absurd.

Yes its true that there are flaws and unknown facts about evolution, but look at this way: science has been progressing in the field of discovery, and your were logic enough to realize that you can use science against science. Take this for example: hundred of years ago majority of people believe that the earth was flat, these people based their information on books with un verified truths(not science), however science was able to prove that it was actually sphere shape

Now, for the evolution it's neither false or true, it's bot 100% proven YET, however using logic you can't use creationism based on books/words with useless and unverified informations, if it requires science to prove evolution, it also requires science to disprove it.

However, you have a point, if its not the contemporary (man-made) God that you were referring to, then i would probably believe that there is a possibility of a creator, a creator who governs all laws of the universe, not the theism version of God/creator.

Answer 5

What bugs me is that there doesn't seem to be many (if any) transitional forms of everything that has evolved. If evolution is as slow as is claimed, how come we don't have a clear fossil record of the transitional forms of every species from every epoch of the evolutionary process? I am not an apologist for creationism but neither can I put my entire "bet" on that which is still a theory to explain how everything came into being.

Answer 6

A) Animals that find a certain niche in nature don't have to evolve anymore.
B) You want to talk about biased. How about the people who begin on the assumption that god exists and then work backwards and try to find evidence for his existence.
C) Evolution has a lot of evidence going for it but whether you choose to believe it occured naturally or it was guided by some force is up to you.

Answer 7

evolutionist use millions of years to explain what they dont have a clue about..as long as they continue to fabricate lies, that some people claim to believe, they still secure grant money for research projects,,therefore they can still continue to think they are of brilliant minds, they even lie to theirself, funny thing is,,it takes alot more faith to believe in evolution than it does God..why is it when someone that dont believe in God, gets scared or when something bad happens, the first words out of thier mouth is ''OH my GOD "--

Answer 8

Heh... Charleston Heston. He must be a really good dancer.

Answer 9

the banana theory. BANANA. BaNaNa. the banana theory. the banana theory. the banana theory. THE banana Theory. i will forever connect christianity and the banana theory. god created the banana therefore christianity is true. i'm just connecting the yellow dots. the banana theory is all you need to know./scientists are stupid because they don't understand the banana theory.i bet charleton heston eats bananas.

Answer 10

Hehehe...

Keep on thinking that creationism has "be" proven...

And open a Biology (and spelling) book when you're ready to learn something.