How is it better or worse than cooked eggs?
2007-05-05 16:41:03 · 5 answers · asked by mmariners10 2 in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
dude i am as confused as you are. when i saw rocky do it, i thought it was so manly cuz he drank like 4 eggs...i think it's just that, there really are no nutrients lost from cooking, just it's better to cook because of the risk of salmonella and e-coli.
2007-05-05 16:53:42 · answer #1 · answered by rockbigmoney2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One con I could think of is spending several days on the toilet with salmonella poisoning, something that doesn't happen with properly cooked eggs.
2007-05-05 16:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by vampire_kitti 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A con is disease. You have to cook things to kill things. It's a risk as with eating uncooked meats or fish. Your choice. I don't know how it is better unless some nutrients are destroyed by cooking.
2007-05-05 16:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jack 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you might s-h-i-t an omlet or a baby chick.
2007-05-05 16:49:51 · answer #4 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
gross
2007-05-05 16:50:40 · answer #5 · answered by max 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋