English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You just have to be willing to open your eyes and see them. They are real, physical things, not theory. Are you that completely unwilling to learn that you deny concrete evidence? See the site below for just a fraction of the info available, if you only bother to look!

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

2007-05-05 15:37:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Wow. Offer them the proof they're always asking for and then they all shut up. Cowards!!

2007-05-05 15:45:27 · update #1

9 answers

HI Mel,
I have run short of time for reading this evening but I will do so later. I am always open to reading and studying such material. I am very much a Christian and may disagree with you but I will study this material. Thank you for the opportunity to do so. Have a great evening.
Thanks,
Eds

2007-05-05 15:50:13 · answer #1 · answered by Eds 7 · 0 0

No, there is no real indication that one form of life transforms into completely different form.

Some evolutionists have attempted to deal with the fossil evidence by introducing the idea of punctuated equilibrium. These scientists say that the jumps in the fossil rector reflect evolutionary jumps which brought on major changes in shorter ties. Hence, evolution is not gradual, but punctuated by sudden leaps from one stage to the next. The theory has been criticized because they cannot produce any evidence for a mechanism of secondary causes which makes these sudden advances possible. Their theory then appears to be based solely on the absence of transitional fossils.

Darwin, after all, understood suddenness to be evidence of Creation. If this is true, then it supports what Creationists said all along- sudden appearance of fully formed animals is evidence of Creation.

2007-05-05 22:53:57 · answer #2 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0 0

It isn't "theists" who deny the plain evidence of science. It is a small group of fundamentalists whose biblical interpretations are so faulty that they conflict with the obvious truth. Most scientists are theists; and most theists are not afraid of scientific facts.
.

2007-05-05 22:48:38 · answer #3 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0 0

The same reason they think carbon dating is our only dating method. Ignorance,and the complete lack of will to lose it.

2007-05-05 22:42:09 · answer #4 · answered by Jett 4 · 2 2

I agree......and once you start to question the fossils and find out that the fundamental christians are wrong, you start to question other things. That is knowledge!!!

2007-05-05 22:41:01 · answer #5 · answered by drpsholder 4 · 2 2

Here are some good lists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

2007-05-05 22:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Have you seen them? Or does all your proof come from a biased website?

2007-05-05 22:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

There are none so blind as those that will not see.

I think that's in the bible someplace.

2007-05-05 22:42:43 · answer #8 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 2 3

good point, and we are called "closed minded"

2007-05-05 22:42:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers