LOL!
Conception is the start of all life!
2007-05-05 15:01:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by tattie_herbert 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is some theory that "on the other end" of a black hole (the center or something like that, it's like in a different dimension) is a "white hole". This white hole could be a universe in itself. This could mean we live in a white hole, which is a "baby universe" of a larger universe. It's too hard to imagine for laymen (like me). You could watch these interviews with Dr. Michio Kaku, one of the founding fathers of string theory:
http://www.mkaku.org/books-tv-film/video.html
String theory is a mathematical philosophy to explain both the tiny quantum physics, and the great universe in one theory, and so far it seems to do a good job at that. Unfortunately so far it can't be proofed or tested, but when CERN, the biggest machine and particle accelerator in the world, is in use, it might be, or it might be disproved.
Science is not gonna be boring in the next decades anyhow.
http://www.cern.ch
2007-05-05 15:46:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Caveman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big Bang and Black Hole? Friend, you're confused...
... you mean Big Bang and Big Crunch.
The Big Bang is when the universe was so tightly compressed it exploded and expanded.
The Big Crunch is when the universe is/will be so vastly expanded that it will collapse in on itself and become tightly compressed.
As for Black Holes, they are extremely dense stars that have moved on and are a vaccuum vortex, sucking in everything around it, to the point even light cannot escape the strength of its gravitational pull. Objects, molecules, ATOMS are all pulled apart into pieces by Black Holes. They contain a great amount of harnessable energy. It is believe that if one can survive going through one (maybe oneday?) that there will be a parallel dimension on the other side.
- 17 yo Pagan
2007-05-05 15:01:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady Myrkr 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
The Big Bang is a scientific theory which states, in its simplest form, that the universe was created in the instantaneous creation of molecules. Here's a website about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
A black hole isn't a theory, and it's not used with "the," because there are probably millions of black holes within the universe. A black hole is basically a collapsed piece of the universe which has such a strong gravitational pull, it pulls everything into it, including light. Here's the wikipedia for black holes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
2007-05-05 15:03:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree, it sounds like a porno title. The big bang that filled the black hole. Interesting.
2007-05-05 15:01:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Um, they aren't exclusive. But there are theoretically more than one black hole, but probably only 1 (recent) Big Bang.
The opposite of a Big Bang is the Big Crunch...
And it's all THEORY, just like evolution.
2007-05-05 15:01:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
there are various nicely-respected physicists, alongside with Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Sean M. Carroll, Victor Stenger, Michio Kaku, Alan Guth, Alex Vilenkin, Robert A.J. Matthews, and Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, who've created scientific fashions the place the huge Bang and subsequently the full universe ought to stand up from no longer something yet a quantum vacuum fluctuation -- by way of organic strategies. In relativity, gravity is unfavourable power and count is helpful power. because of fact the two look equivalent in absolute entire fee, our observable universe looks balanced to the sum of 0. Our universe ought to subsequently have come into life with out violating conservation of mass and power — with the difficulty of the universe condensing out of the helpful power because of fact the universe cooled, and gravity produced from the unfavourable power. while power condenses into count, equivalent components of count and antimatter are created — which annihilate one yet another to style power. besides the undeniable fact that there seems to be a reasonable imbalance to the technique, which finally ends up in count dominating over antimatter. i comprehend that this would not make experience in our Newtonian adventure, besides the undeniable fact that it does interior the area of quantum mechanics and relativity. As Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman wrote, "the assumption of quantum electrodynamics describes nature as absurd from the attitude of hassle-free experience. And it consents completely with test. So i'm hoping you may settle for nature as she is — absurd." For extra, watch the video on the 1st link - "A Universe From no longer something" via Lawrence Krauss. -
2016-12-28 14:36:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big Bang made stars, some stars become black holes.
2007-05-05 15:01:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tina R 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
when someone refers to "a big bang" that means a star has died and exploded in astranomical proportions creating an explosion big enough to create a black hole, this is all heresay but from the knowledge i have gathered over years that is a way a black hole can be created
2007-05-05 15:02:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ryan 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
That is a long topic. The math is similar as the energy is in a similar state. If you really want more than that, major in Physics or read Hawking.
2007-05-05 15:02:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Big bang is a scientific theory.
Black hole is a scientific fact.
2007-05-05 15:01:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by Stuart 7
·
5⤊
2⤋