2007-05-05 14:02:17 · 10 answers · asked by ManhattanGirl 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
After George 'Retard' Bush? Yes, but only slightly. The religious right, once again, figured out how they got used by sociopathic politicians. They are bruised and nursing their wounds, but religions going to have some prominence for another decade. It's the loud-mouthed neo-cons who can see no wrong in Bush who will get worked down by seeing a liberal president lead us to greater good than Bush even ever had in mind who will slowly fade into the background.
2007-05-05 14:08:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
a million. The president does not ought to be a Protestant Christian, inspite of the incontrovertible fact that that is totally not likely they are going to get elected in united statesa. in the event that they don't seem to be. I prefer this became not the case, yet regrettably dissimilar human beings prefer faith to dictate their comments for them. 2. i could vote for the guy I agreed with, in spite of religion. i've got met human beings athiests who have been extra Christian than Christians, and so on. purely simply by fact a guy or woman professes to stay a undeniable way does not advise their strikes/perspectives will journey what they say they think. regrettably in politics, we've seen too many examples the place a guy or woman states a nicely-liked religious view (ex. anti-gay marriage) yet is behaving in a opposite way of their own lives (having gay affairs). What a guy or woman says and what they do are very diverse concerns. i could constantly base my comments on a guy or woman's strikes fairly than their words. 3. nicely, JFK became Catholic fairly than Protestant, yet i think of he's the only non Protestant occasion so some distance that has been elected. i could anticipate being religious could be best to being non-religious in terms of having votes, yet i think of the fact that we've had a girl and a black guy make it so some distance in this election is a stable sign that we individuals are headed in the direction of a extra tolerant and open-minded destiny in terms of who we decide for to run our united states.
2016-10-14 21:29:20 · answer #2 · answered by sedgwick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only problem I have with voting democrat is the abortion issue. I would be a very happy little christian if we could get a good democratic candidate that opposes abortion. Religion has nothing to do with how I vote (though honestly, I don't think I could vote for a muslim or a scientologist, as muslims would put women under house arrest and scientologists are just nuts), just as religion has nothing to do with my opposing abortion. Science shows showing "fetus's" sucking their thumbs and playing with their toes don't really aide the whole "abortion isn't murder" theory and believe it or not, all right-to-lifers aren't christians.
2007-05-05 14:18:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely! I think that the religions of two of the candidates (Romney and Obama) will come up in the primaries and that neither one of them will be deemed electable because of it.
Let's face it...monkeys will fly out of my ar$e before there is ever a Mormon President...and Obama's "church" is about as much a "black separatist" movement as it is a place of worship.
Besides....I really don't believe that this country is quite ready to elect someone raised as a Muslim... and with a name like "Barack Hussein Obama"
2007-05-05 14:16:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Define religion. If you mean organized religion, likely not. If you mean to ask if people will vote in a way which is consistent with their morals, values, experiences and faith, the answer is yes. The majority of people in America have a faith in God. It is natural to be guided by your beliefs, religious or otherwise.
2007-05-05 14:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe it will this time. People will lay down their morals to get a Democrat in this time.
I think Hilary will win. But I don't like it. She has an anti-Christ spirit. But she will full fill bible prophecy.
2007-05-05 14:23:42 · answer #6 · answered by Old Hickory 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It should not. Jesus said he & we were no part of the world. He would not have anything to do with politics.
We also realize it doesn't matter who wins. They will not be able to solve man's current problems; not prevent coming disasters.
2007-05-05 15:23:23 · answer #7 · answered by grnlow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i hope not. there are many beneficial things that could be passed (stemcell research( this especially b\c i'm diabetic) and Gay Marriage to name a few) if it weren't for religion blocking the way.
2007-05-05 14:06:32 · answer #8 · answered by Iris 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Won't matter the winners already been chosen.
2007-05-05 14:07:42 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus Zombie 2 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. People want change, they want healthcare
2007-05-05 14:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋