Should Chimpanzee's be granted basic rights?

Question

In some ways, Hiasl is like any other Viennese: He indulges a weakness for pastry, likes to paint and enjoys chilling out by watching TV.

But he doesn't care for coffee, and he isn't actually a person — at least not yet.

In a closely watched test case that could set a global legal precedent for granting basic rights to apes, Austrian animal rights advocates are waging an unusual court battle to get the 26-year-old male chimpanzee legally declared a "person."

http://www.foxnews.com/printer_frie...

Answer 1

Mike, still no valid reason for having an ape declared a person. I am certain that if the people trying this put as much effort into it, they could find someone to adopt Hiasl as a pet or reintroduce him into the wild. Legally declaring one chimp a person, puts us on the road to giving basic HUMAN rights to all chimps, then other animals.

Answer 2

This has nothing to do with religion and spirituality. Due to Austrian laws, this is the only way to assure the chimps future safety.
You didn't include the reason for the efforts (obviously trying to make it a more controversial topic):

The campaign began after the animal sanctuary where Hiasl (pronounced HEE-zul) and another chimp, Rosi, have lived for 25 years went bankrupt.

Activists want to ensure the apes don't wind up homeless if the shelter closes. Both have already suffered: They were captured as babies in Sierra Leone in 1982 and smuggled in a crate to Austria for use in pharmaceutical experiments. Customs officers intercepted the shipment and turned the chimps over to the shelter.

Their food and veterinary bills run about $6,800 a month. Donors have offered to help, but there's a catch: Under Austrian law, only a person can receive personal donations.

Organizers could set up a foundation to collect cash for Hiasl, whose life expectancy in captivity is about 60 years. But without basic rights, they contend, he could be sold to someone outside Austria, where the chimp is protected by strict animal cruelty laws.

"If we can get Hiasl declared a person, he would have the right to own property. Then, if people wanted to donate something to him, he'd have the right to receive it," said Theuer, who has vowed to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

Answer 3

I think the idea of rights has to do with right arm catalepsy. Hypnosis induces catalepsy, beginning in the right arm. This, I think, would be why King Arthur's magic sword was in stone, according to mythology. It is not seemly for a king to hypnotise. It means suppressing your anger against a hypnotist. It can happen via the fixation technique or verbal abuse, for example, where you imagine that there's a hidden truth behind the obvious one that your senses are telling you. Only a king that successfully glamourises mysticism over practicality could get away with that.

As for this chimp, if they were going to pick one to be human, is this one a good choice? It appears to have picked up on the practicalities of the situation, thereby safeguarding the mobility of its right arm. I'm not sure about the TV watching though. There isn't by any chance a hidden motive that his health isn't doing too well, and his "friends" are blaming the way he's treated prejudicially as a non-human species?

Answer 4

Austrian Chimp? Heck he could run for Gov of California or even Chancellor of Germany

Answer 5

This is getting absurd. No ape should be considered a "person". Yes, they can do things like a human but they still act like an animal.
Ridiculous.

Answer 6

no longer genuine even by a slender margin. Kurds already do have straightforward rights because the rightful electorate of this us of a. certain human rights violations do exist in Turkey, as they exist in each and each us of a in the global, yet they don't look inspired by adjustments in ethnicity. every person who helps or believes in what you wrote above contained in the question is a) really ignorant and worse, loves being ignorant (we've an invaluable word for those variety of ignoramuses, they are referred to as 'dumb') and feels no disgrace or regret for no longer being recommended adequate at the same time as his/her lack of understanding is printed b) is a damage moron who loves bashing Turkey each and anytime an chance arises in accordance at the same time with his/her shallow understanding of activities and thereby hopes to be a centre of interest because that no human being supplies a rattling about them less than time-honored situations c) is a terrorist/ terrorist sympathiser/lackey (certain, we've genuine terrorists in this us of a, we do no longer ought to locate imaginary terrorists between the civilian inhabitants of a area like a particular center jap state does to justify using disproportionate rigidity) (There may be tremendous overlapping contained in the above situations for sure) by the way, if human beings advised others to "sparkling their personal outside first" formerly struggling with human rights violations in different elements of the global, we may in basic terms motivate those who perpetrate human rights violations and implement the undesirable status quo. So advocating a "sparkling your own outside" stance is adversarial to each and each of the common values about human rights by definition, it strips the right to 'criticize' from brokers except the state and this violates the tenets of democracy in accordance to se. As different purchasers have said, 30 000 is the variety of victims of PKK.

Answer 7

i'm sorry but until this chimpanzee gains an intelligence that could rival that of homo sapiens, i don't think that it should get the basic rights of a person or get legally declared a "person". not that i have anything against the chimpanzee, but it's just not quite ethical, as of yet, in my opinion.

Answer 8

I read this too, he should be granted the rights he needs to live. It kind of makes you think: how different are they from us really? I mean you can teach them sign language and they can communicate their thoughts that way.

Answer 9

Cool--and here I thought Mr. Chips was just a silly eighties TV show

Answer 10

Absolutely damn right, and about time too.

Look at the barely-evolved slime who are accorded human status already.

CD