Honestly, I couldn't even tell whose side that guy was on...
2007-05-05 12:00:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
LOL! i think he's the same guy who wrote that ABSURD thing about a car salesman and how cars evolved (he was TRYING to be sarcastic) :D
look One under God,you're not making any sense! as for that previous Q,it was hardly coherent! how can anyone "rebut" something that's utter gizaldigoook!
2007-05-05 19:01:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by nicky 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
noted you didnt rebut
yet were first to reply
as to the next respondant ,your deluding the used car bit
it is interesting that every respondant has avoided answering the question
they have seen the ''fossils'' but not seen the casts of plaster, nor willing to scratch the surface
very scientific that
how many of you clever respondants have bothered to check the facts behind your theory
it reveals how many of you are here , waiting to rebut believers
by your deeds be revealed , those proofs you accept are but plaster casts
even that they were cast from are failed adaptions away from genomic type [failed evolutions]
you have achieved your goal
mine was but to expose the thought behind your theory
not much going by your responses
2007-05-05 19:01:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I don't think I've ever thought "Oh ****, another own goal". I can't even begin to fathom what that's supposed to mean.
2007-05-05 19:04:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Deof Movestofca 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well he is no different than any other creationist; completely unaware of what he's talking about.
2007-05-05 19:02:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yoda Green 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
hehehee! you know he's the same guy who made that argument about a carsalesman....and how HE had tried to explain to the carsalesman that cars EVOLVED!!!
makes you wonder....sad :D lol
2007-05-05 19:08:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think I understood a bit of that.
2007-05-05 18:59:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
I can only hope he ment well
2007-05-05 19:10:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by j.wisdom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about?
2007-05-05 19:03:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by kime 2
·
0⤊
0⤋