Random Big Bang!
And other stuff, like geological activity, evolution, stellar mechanics (i think that's what they call it.)
And people, as they evolved, evolved a preference for certain conditions and items (like sunny days, starry nights, green meadows, vast open spaces, cozy places to rest, vitamin rich fruits, greasy foods, etc.)
Now whether this was done by God, or not is anyone's guess.
2007-05-05 11:03:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Bad Day 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, the Big Bang does hold water. Just because you want to ignore scientific evidence doesn't mean I have to do so. And the Big Bang is not necessarily a random occurrence, as there is a growing belief that it is a reoccurring pattern. But I suppose that it does hold less water than a magical being waving its magical wand and blinking everything into existence. Wait, no, the opposite of that.
2007-05-05 11:57:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by seattlefan74 5
·
9⤊
0⤋
Posting a science question in the religion and spirituality section often means the asker does not really want an answer. His goal is to ask a question that he believes proves some scientific knowledge to be wrong, or that science does not yet answer, and make the implicit claim that the only other explanation is a god, and specifically, the same god he happens to believe in.
It's the "god of the gaps" - intellectually bankrupt, since it favors ignorance instead of knowledge, and because of the contained logical fallacy.
However, on the off chance that you really want to know the answer:
The big bang. You lack the scientific background to understand it, though. Why not pick up a book? Say, "The First Three Minutes".
2007-05-05 11:54:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by eldad9 6
·
13⤊
0⤋
Let's say the Big Bang theory isn't true. Now going by that, just because we don't truly know how the world got here doesn't automatic prove any God, especially the one you believe in.
Seriously people, when is the whole "we don't know, so Goddidit" argument gonna stop?
2007-05-05 12:01:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ievianty 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
"because i don't understand your evidence, therefore it's false". is not a good way to prove a point. i suggest you read a good book on physics and cosmology by a reputable scientist. and if you still have trouble understanding it, post specific questions in the science section. i'm afraid that the big bang does fit all the observable evidence, especially the inflationary model. they're even beginning to tackle the "something out of nothing" question and have got some very viable models for it.
2007-05-05 12:24:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The plural of atheist is atheists...
As the first answerer said, if you wanted a serious answer to this question you would have asked it in the appropriate science classification.
Your "argument" is nothing new - but I'd really prefer that you didn't imply that what "you know" and what "I know" are the same thing. I can admit I don't know lots of things, but I don't need to manufacture a logical impossibility to try and explain things which are beyond my grasp. There's nothing wrong with not knowing, it makes life fun.
2007-05-05 11:59:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
If every element exists within the universe that is necessary for creating a planet like earth which obviously it does where does the supernatural come into it? I don't understand why the supernatural would be necessary to explain something that already has a natural and credible explanation.
2007-05-05 12:17:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because you think it does not hold water does not make it untrue.
Current hypothesis on string theory and multi dimensional universes indicate that it is quite possible and happening all the 'time'. (If 'time' has any meaning representation in a 13 dimensional universe.)
And who says it it beautiful? If it is so beautiful why are there liver flukes and guinea worms in it? (Amongst a myriad of other nasty very unbeautiful creatures.)
Go back to your cop out answer of GodDidIt and just try to not think about where your god came from himself.
2007-05-05 12:00:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Simon T 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Big bang is only a working theory. But it makes more sense than a creator that kills.
Which is more likely, a perfect god that comes into existence to create a disparate universe where he creates us, or a dispirate universe that leads to our creation. Since the creation of a perfect god is harder to do, it makes sense that he wasn't here first.
2007-05-05 11:54:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
0⤋
humans need a figare head which we use when we fail to completley understand why, how, We as humans still do not use the total brain we all have. Everlostion takes a very long time and we humans only live a dot in time
2007-05-05 12:05:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by 121aloraphotos 6
·
1⤊
0⤋