http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070504/terror-suspects-guns
2007-05-05 02:56:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Don't agree with the NRA on anything.
2007-05-05 05:43:14 · answer #1 · answered by toowit2wu 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You're twisting the facts. The NRA opposes discretionary weapons purchases. In other words, they oppose in principal the idea of someone arbitrarily refusing someone's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. In that aspect, it is another step for the gun control lobby to ban weapons purchases altogether. If the person is a terrorist, they most likely won't have the qualifications to lawfully purchase a gun anyway despite the label.
As far as terrorists go, the NRA despises them as much or more than anyone else. As a matter of fact, an NRA member is one person that the terrorist (domestic or foreign) hopes to avoid if they choose to attack. Why? because that NRA member is likely to be armed, and may put a definite kink in the terrorists' plans.
The NRA doesn't support terrorism at all. Next time get your facts together before you make an inflammatory statement.
2007-05-05 04:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by Hootiesplace 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are quite mixed up. The NRA does NOT support allowing terrorist to buy guns. A suspect is just that, a suspect , and nothing more.. Anyone can levy allegations at another person, but here in the U.S., at least at the present time, a person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
2007-05-05 08:47:22 · answer #3 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cite your source of the position you acquire this assistance yet no matter if that is a valid reason than he might want to signal it. although, dont you have to be a US citizen to get a gun contained in the u . s . a .? and would not terror suspects no longer be able to receive through lack of social safe practices card? purely curious on my 2 questions no longer saying that you're incorrect with the help of any ability i'm surely unfamiliar in this topic and would pick to understand
2016-11-25 20:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by arnie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with this statement:
"As many of our friends in law enforcement have rightly pointed out, the word 'suspect' has no legal meaning, particularly when it comes to denying constitutional liberties," Cox wrote.
2007-05-05 05:30:04 · answer #5 · answered by Jon L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I don't believe that suspects, who are innocent until proven guilty, should be denied any right if they are American citizens.
2007-05-05 04:09:17 · answer #6 · answered by ian_eadgbe 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you asking should US citizens who have never committed a crime, have never been arrested and are sane, that for no other reason than being a suspect, they should have thier constitutional rights denied ?
2007-05-05 08:57:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
sure do , if they are americans ( the only one legally aloowed to purchase a gun) and pass the background check they have every right to own a firearm
2007-05-05 05:04:53 · answer #8 · answered by Dr.Bucksnort 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do.
2007-05-05 09:17:03 · answer #9 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋