2007-05-04 23:13:03 · 20 answers · asked by Artistic Hand 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Chimps don't have tails,they are like us in this respect,they may have hail tails at one point but no longer. Monkeys have tails,apes don't.
AD
2007-05-05 00:07:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even a human being will have tail similar to those of a chimp than only u should ask this a ghost believer
Allah o Akbar!
2007-05-05 06:24:59 · answer #2 · answered by Acid 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What would a tail have to do with it? And when is the last time you saw a chimp with a tail? Weird question, sorry.
2007-05-05 06:19:26 · answer #3 · answered by Linda R 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would still believe that chimps, and people have a common designer.
Darwin said in the Origin of Species
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
According to Professor of Biochemistry Michael J. Behe, and many others the bacterial flagellum
and other such biochemical life forms could NOT have been formed in the way Darwin expected, and therefore breaks down Darwin's theory according to his own words.
2007-05-05 06:38:48 · answer #4 · answered by Mad Maxine 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
IF I had a tail similar to a chimp --- what would that have to do with my head/heart and soul being a Christian? Body parts -- a human does not make -- a heart/soul make a human.
2007-05-05 06:23:13 · answer #5 · answered by missellie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The name God refers to the deity held by monotheists to be the supreme reality. God is generally regarded as the sole creator of the universe.
Many arguments for and against the existence of God have been proposed and rejected by philosophers, theologians, and other thinkers. In philosophical terminology, existence of God arguments concern schools of thought on the epistemology of the ontology of God.
There are many philosophical issues concerning the existence of God. Some definitions of God are so nonspecific that it is certain that something exists that meets the definition; while other definitions are apparently self-contradictory. Arguments for the existence of God typically include metaphysical, empirical, inductive, and subjective types. Arguments against the existence of God typically include empirical, deductive, and inductive types
The purpose of this brief study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective. To do this, we are assuming that we exist, that there is reality, and that the matter of which we are made is real. If you do not believe that you exist, you have bigger problems than this study will entail and you will have to look elsewhere
2007-05-05 06:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by gorgeous_tine23ph 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Here we go again: We have a coccyx that does us no good, we have an appendix that's useless and we have a dangle in our throat that's not any good and, some of us don't use our brains, not saying whom. So, to answer your question, if we had a tail it would serve the same purpose and we'd have no differences about it, we'd all know it's useless.
2007-05-05 07:05:10 · answer #7 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Comprehension means "with grasping" as monkey's tails are prehensile.
However, as "Collapse of Chaos" says, metaphor is a step up from comprehension as a learning tool. Metaphor means bearing the meaning of one word over to another word.
2007-05-05 06:21:09 · answer #8 · answered by cross_wars 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If I still had my tail, it would be symbolic about my soul's intention to help the animals out of the hell humans think they should be in, when really it's the other way around and that's why death still exists
2007-05-05 06:40:12 · answer #9 · answered by isis 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I still believe in God even I'm a monster and turn ugly
2007-05-05 06:18:04 · answer #10 · answered by Sυ$ιє 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋