I want to solicit ideas. My friend asked me about this question and I find it hard to answer her. I dont want to give my bias opinion and it would only break them apart .
2007-05-04 22:55:33 · 13 answers · asked by amy n 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I've been married to both circumcised and uncircumcised men. To me, the uncircumcised male parts function more naturally, the way they were meant to. It's amazing the functionality that is taken away when the foreskin is removed! Circumcision can actually lead to more discomfort on the woman's part during the act.
I wouldn't break up with my fiance on the basis of whether or not he was circumcised, nor would I demand that he alter his natural state. Many women seem to be fearful of foreskins, when they are actually such a small part of a whole man, NOT repulsive, NOT dirty, and actually contribute to the whole erotic experience.
2007-05-04 23:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Kitty! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Uncircumcised is how normal people are: I dont know where you are from, but genital mutilation is illegal in most parts of the world, do you have any idea what circumisation is, places that practice it are completly inhumane, they strapp a beautiful new born baby who has just had there beautiful world taken from them being forced through a dark narrow tunnel into a loud and bright world,
The foreskin is not retractable untill three years old it is glued to to head of the penis like your fingernail is glued to the top of your finger, now can you imagine how inhumane that is to rip and cut a beautiful natural peice of flesh from a beautiful baby boy, what if this happended to you when you were born, the doctor decided that it is digusting to have a clitorious so lets cutt it off, why mention this you say because the clitorious us infact a male organ if you had genes to be male would of continued to be a penis.
How can you justify harming and causing undue pain to a baby let alone a human being????
2007-05-05 06:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by alias 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've never been with an uncircumcised man. I heard it's very different.
2007-05-05 05:58:50 · answer #3 · answered by luckford2004 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Circumcision is only a matter of choice. Some religions require it, but I think it should be up to the parents if they want their child circumcised. Its only a matter of teaching the little boy to wash himself properly if they don't have him circumcised.
2007-05-05 06:04:39 · answer #4 · answered by kiwi_mum1966 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And this is important why? Seriously, if they're getting married in two months and she doesn't know what his penis looks like, then the question of his foreskin isn't the biggest of her problems.
2007-05-05 05:59:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey! Nothing wrong with uncircumcised. My boyfriend is and i think I actually PREFER it to being circumsised...
2007-05-05 13:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is wrong with bein uncircumcised. A penis is a penis, and does what it is supposed to do!
2007-05-05 05:57:59 · answer #7 · answered by Susan 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it really doesnt matter.the matter is your feelings.if you really love the person accept him/her of what she/he is.it just the body the important is the heart,the feelings.just ignore what others might think or say just follow what makes you happy.
2007-05-05 06:23:55 · answer #8 · answered by wa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being a sensitive matter, it is better to have detailed question for a right answer...
2007-05-05 06:05:58 · answer #9 · answered by Harish Jharia 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
whats the big deal with circumcision....?
its not dangerous to sleep with a man with his foreskin still on!!!
2007-05-05 05:59:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋