English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who created this science which you study? The science from which you gain knowledge? Dont you have access to internet resources that will lead to a scientifice conculusion that evolution theory have been refuted and God indeed exists?

2007-05-04 21:00:29 · 13 answers · asked by Acid 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

who created this god you believe? don't you have access to internet resources that refute the existence of god? why do you care?

2007-05-04 21:04:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

"Who created this science which you study?" What a stupid question. Science is discovered, not created.

Dont you have access to internet resources that will lead to a scientifice conculusion that evolution theory have been refuted and God indeed exists?

There's evidence that all humans have stemmed from one woman in Africa-not Adam and Eve.

God is not the default option if evolution theories disappear, which they have yet to do.

2007-05-04 21:05:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Claim CA110:
Evolution is a theory in crisis; it will soon be widely rejected.
Source:
See Morton 2002a, below.
Response:

1. Evolution is one of the most strongly supported theories in all of science. It is nowhere near a theory in crisis.

2. This claim has been made constantly since even before Darwin. In all that time, the theory of evolution has only gotten stronger. Prior to the development of evolutionary theory, almost 100 percent of relevant scientists were creationists. Now the number is far less than 1 percent. The numbers continue to drop as the body of evidence supporting evolutionary theory continues to build. Thus, claims of scientists abandoning evolution theory for creationism are untrue.

3. This claim directly contradicts another common claim, that evolution cannot be falsified.

Links:
Morton, G. R. 2002a. The imminent demise of evolution: The longest running falsehood in creationism, http://home.entouch.net/dmd/moreandmore.htm

Morton, G. R. 2002b. Morton's Demon (Post of the month, Feb. 2002). http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/feb02.html

2007-05-04 21:07:40 · answer #3 · answered by eldad9 6 · 1 0

Yes, I have access to Internet resources. Those Internet resources allowed me to find this:

"The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully explain observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, anthropology, and others. One 1987 estimate found that more than 99.84% of almost 500,000 US scientists in the earth and life sciences supported evolution over creation science. An expert in the evolution-creationism controversy, professor and author Brian Alters, states that "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution". A 1991 Gallup poll of Americans found that only about 5% of scientists (including those with training outside biology) identified themselves as creationists."

2007-05-04 21:07:01 · answer #4 · answered by . 7 · 2 0

Why carry out a little theists seem to have this burning would desire to assign a faith to atheists? Atheists do no longer "have confidence in" technological awareness in a non secular experience; the conclusions of technological awareness are constantly tentative. it fairly is the character of inductive reasoning. faith regularly relies upon on revelation as a direction to know-how; revelation is conspicuously absent from the scientific technique. people who % out as atheists (as adversarial to followers of nontheistic religions like Buddhism) regularly have not have been given any faith. specific, it is achieveable for a individual to no longer have any faith in any respect. i don't be conscious of why that's so difficult for some to understand.

2017-01-09 12:52:35 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I can use the internet to lead me to the conclusion that unicorns and dragons exist, too. The internet is a very sketchy place. The only science I put any faith on is that that has been tested and reported by multiple credible sources, which evolution has, and creationism has not.

2007-05-04 21:06:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Science was created by men to understand God's work. God guided evolution. God has been coexisting with science.

2007-05-04 21:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Gone 4 · 0 1

i am a believer, but here are my 2 cents anyway. science is a method that mankind can use to gain a greater understanding of the natural universe. it is a search for knowledge through observation and guesswork

our faith in God should be absolute- our belief in science should be intellectual – and nothing more

2007-05-04 21:04:34 · answer #8 · answered by Silver 5 · 1 1

Evolution has NOT been refuted. http://evolution.berkeley.udu So you need to wake up out of your delusions, and face reality.

2007-05-04 21:18:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That's a common logical fallacy you've made. In your question, you've already assumed the answer. When you ask who did it, you're saying someone did. Ask a better question next time.

2007-05-05 05:48:27 · answer #10 · answered by Phil 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers