I'm all for creation by God! Amen!!
2007-05-04 10:31:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by ru4rael 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
1. If we were alll floating around in a void at the beginning it would have benn impossible for us to be created.
2. Thus the hydrogen that caused it all must have been made by something
Sorry, that's a non-sequitor.
2007-05-04 10:30:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
"If we were alll floating around in a void at the beginning it would have been impossible for us to be created."
-- Why? How do you know?
"Thus the hydrogen that caused it all must have been made by something"
-- That doesn't follow from your first point, and in any event how do you know hydrogen needs to be made by something?
"Thus not only did God create all..."
-- That doesn't follow from any of your premises. It all could have been made by aliens or the big bang.
2007-05-04 10:35:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You forgot the feminine aspect that's responsible for reproduction. On top of that, most living things require some sort of sexual mating habit to reproduce.
Plus, if there was a singular, male God , I don't see anything remotely like that.
And, if God was perfect, why did he create anything?
Christianity's unnaturalness really boggles the mind-especially since nature is supposed to be created by the Christian God version.
2007-05-04 10:40:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by strpenta 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
And believing in a Sky Daddy who was created by nothing makes more sense? If you're so interested in knowing how things came into being, how did your god come into being? what makes him up? Where did he come from? Why does he exist? Doesn't your inability to answers any of these questions with proof provide evidence that he doesn't exist?
2007-05-04 10:34:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you're saying it is more logical that an infinitely complex creator, who by definition must be more complex than its creation, existed without creation than the basic elements of the universe?
While a deity is illogical, the OT has been absolutely ripped apart.
2007-05-04 10:32:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jett 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's a start I suppose. I always, when considering this question asked myself what is "God." I think that maybe starting with proving how any being can be omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent might be a route to go.
2007-05-04 10:34:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by wolfwoods01girl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have successfully shown the need for a prima causa (first cause).
However, the line of discussion you have opened can deduce nothing of the properties of the first cause -- it could be entirely natural, it could be an infinite succession of finite causes (turtles on turtles), it could be a deity other than yours, it could be a deity no one's ever heard of even!
So, sorry... no. Doesn't work.
2007-05-04 10:31:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe that the Big Bang is the dead and beginning at the same time.
The start of this Universe is probably the end of another one.
The proof is coming........
2007-05-04 10:35:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Human logic could never prove nor disprove God's existence.
2007-05-04 10:32:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Paien 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
have a banana. and how did you get from something created it all to Jesus. something doesn't prove the divinity of JC. thats a big leap. have another banana
2007-05-04 10:34:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by robertbobbybob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋