2007-05-04 09:18:37 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Yes...they should stop it and they should go back and make sure all previous cases are sent back also. The government leaders have been so lax on this that they should serve jail time for not doing their jobs, and the border guards who were doing their jobs should be released immediately.
2007-05-04 09:30:27 · answer #1 · answered by clbinmo 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely!!! If the United States would do that, we could probably stop millions of illegal immigrants from coming into the United States!
I recently heard about an illegal Guatemalan who didn't want to go back to his own country and take his children, because his three children were born here and were, under current law, legal U. S. citizens! I say he should have thought about *that* when he illegally entered our country!
2007-05-04 09:34:58 · answer #2 · answered by trebor namyl hcaeb 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
i imagine we ought to continuously imagine lengthy and demanding beforehand tinkering with the structure. The excellent court hasn't ever right now hung on no matter if the 'citizenship through beginning' part of the 14th change signifies that citizenship is granted even the position the presence of the youngster's pregnant mom might want to be barred through regulation. besides the indisputable fact that, i might want to address immigration guidelines to say that the right of 'kinfolk reunification' which resources a citizen the skill to herald kinfolk along with mom and father might want to not observe to absolutely everyone who did not have a minimum of one unconditional everlasting resident confirm or citizen confirm on the time of their beginning. That avoids the constitutional issue and addresses the 'gaming' with our guidelines.
2016-12-05 08:42:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you consider all the money taken away from US citizens to pay for illegals it's a no brainer.I'm on ssa and my monthly amount is being contested every year to pay for (not the war) but illegals and their children.
Plus if you a tax payer you would be amazed how much is being diverted from social security to help with health care and housing , not considering their food.
Wake-up Americans!
2007-05-04 09:32:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Can't stop them especially if ONE of the parents is a legal resident or a citizen.
2007-05-04 14:35:16 · answer #5 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but I do feel that what they should do is say if you have an anchor baby, then the parents only get deported and their child will get to stay and they are put through our adoption system. I know hispanics value family above all else and knowing their child will be taken away if they try the anchor baby idea will deter them from doing it.
2007-05-04 09:34:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No. But, they should recognize the right of the parents to take thier children home with them, even if that means allowing the parents to repudiate thier child's citizenship.
2007-05-04 09:49:20 · answer #7 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd back an Amendment that changes the 14th Amendment. I think it needs to be born here AND one parent a US citizen (paternity testing as needed for proof).
2007-05-04 09:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
yes, read the 14 amendment. it talks about people from other country's. i think if both parents are not legal then the child should not be legal. we need to be like mexico when it comes to our immigration laws.
2007-05-04 09:37:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes. there are tons of families coming here just to pop out more kids for labor reasons. it's rediculus. those childeren aren't helping anything.
2007-05-04 10:42:21 · answer #10 · answered by love in siberia 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋