I noticed in another posted question that a lot of the countries where athiesm is growing, the prevailing political climate is left wing quasi communist. Have the dope smoking burnout hippie pinkos from the 60's (who now run our schools, justice system and entertainment industries) ensnared poor souls with their evil trap?
2007-05-04 07:54:24 · 14 answers · asked by Sir Offenzalot 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Just having a little fun folks, don't get bent out of shape! It's Friday!
2007-05-04 08:02:39 · update #1
Yes dang those atheists and all the wars they've started in the middle east.
And all those atheist suicide bombers.
2007-05-04 08:01:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Atheists are pretty conservative. They don't beleive in any human spirit. Christians, by contrast believe that spirituality only exists for them and no one else. So, human spirituality must have begun at 1AD. That's pretty wacko. Atheists seem like solid, steady people compared to that. Most dope-smoking hippies are reconstructionist pagans. They want to bring back the ancient religions. While I am a pagan myself, I want a modern interpretations, not a recreation. I like to find a current validity. That's what hippies are doing. While most communists are atheists, none of the atheists on here are communists, they seem like right-wing moderates by the way they argue. The hippies who run the schools never got high and wave the flag for something they missed out on. The entertainment industry's always been comprised of pimps and gangsters, you can't blame atheism for that. Mobsters were Catholic. You don't really research anything. It seems like you just want to rant about out-dated insults without seeing how those people have changed inthe last 40 (!) years. Welcome to 2007. WWII is over. The Cold War is over. Bush won by the smallest of margins and history will make a villian of him. Are you moral or majority?
2007-05-04 08:07:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe that's because in comparison to your own fascist-leaning, right-wing plutocracy, EVERY country looks like a left wing quasi communist.
Face it dudes, your kind is on the way out. Soon the rest of the world will be reaping the benefits of good education and public health care while your country swirls the drain of ignorance and increasing gaps between the haves and the have-nots.
2007-05-04 08:02:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
To best answer your question, no, Atheism is not an evil plot. However, Communism and Socialism embrace Atheism because they are systems where the government is omnipotent. They cannot have anything or anyone that stands in judgement of the arbitrary decisions the government makes. To accept a Diety is to accept moral absolutism. For example, killing innocent people for the gain of others is evil. No so in Socilaist systems. Just look at how many people died under Soviet rule.
.
2007-05-04 08:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Gotta say, those non-religious countries have high per capita incomes, the highest standards of living, healthcare available for all, and a very small rich-poor divide. What's so evil about people in Norway living and let living? They don't seem to be getting in any wars, or bombing anybody, or getting bombed for that matter. They're doing ok for themselves.
2007-05-04 08:02:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
all of us comprehend that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gasoline that stops warmth escaping into area. in case you doubt this you want only evaluate the adjustments in temperature between the earth and the moon. besides, we've regular CO2 is a greenhouse gasoline for better than century considering that John Tyndall examined the houses of atmospheric gases back contained in the 1850s. this isn't up for debate because it really is a reality. all of us comprehend that human activities are pumping close to to 30 billion tonnes of CO2 into the ambience each 12 months. it really is likewise not up for debate because it really is a reality. We also comprehend that CO2 won't be able to easily vanish. So, considering that CO2 is a greenhouse gasoline and we pump it into the ambience in wide parts and all of us comprehend it would not merely vanish, the guidelines of physics let us know our planet will warmth. in case you disagree with something i have suggested then you fairly ought to: a. instruct CO2 isn't a greenhouse gasoline regardless of 150 years worth of experiments on the opposite b. instruct that we are not pumping it into the ambience contained in the parts we assume of we are. c. instruct what's incorrect with the guidelines of physics that let us know our planet will warmth for this reason. the very shown reality that not a unmarried theory has emerged that could want to do all 3 in over 5 many years of discussion is telling. Our planet is warming and human beings are (a minimum of) partly to blame. The guidelines of physics let us know this should be the case, and it really is discovered to be the case experimentally. What extra do you want?
2016-12-05 08:38:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the dope smoking burnouted hippie is now the President, and he's a republican.
2007-05-04 07:58:50 · answer #7 · answered by glitterkittyy 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yeah right... So the biggest threats to mankind are the Netherlands and Canada and Finland and...
2007-05-04 08:02:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
One thing I've always suspected about atheists: The only time they shower is when it rains.
2007-05-05 10:43:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Mankind, just the dweebs.
CD
2007-05-04 08:01:25 · answer #10 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋