Actually I think it should only be Jr. You would use II if say you were naming him after your father, so instead of being a Jr. he would be a second. But if you name him after his dad, he is a Jr.
2007-05-04 06:32:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by rdkernan732 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
While he is a baby the prefix would be Master. After he is grown Mister or Mr. The suffix would be Junior or Jr.
2007-05-04 12:08:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Assuming you mean suffix rather than prefix, it's your choice: you could use Jr. or II.
2007-05-04 12:07:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jennifer M 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
His name would be like Johnny James Jones II
or Johnny James Jones Jr.
2007-05-04 12:20:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by *Heather* 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prefix...as in Mr, Dr., Rev.? Or do you mean suffix like Jr?
2007-05-04 12:08:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by johnnyinsnj 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It would be Jr. You could also say the second (II). That's what my cousin did. I think Jr. is the correct way. Usually it's Jr, III, IV, etc.
2007-05-04 12:10:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by kat 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well if you want to be traditional, he would be a Jr., but if you wanted to get proper and primpy you could say 'II' ( the 2nd)
2007-05-04 12:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Natalie 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Jr
2007-05-04 12:51:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jennifer H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would either be a Jr. or a 2nd or II
2007-05-04 12:12:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Renee B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Junior is the usual for that.
It is not a prefix (since those go first) but we get the idea.
2007-05-04 12:08:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rich Z 7
·
1⤊
0⤋