I know I'd make popcorn for that one.
It'd be a slaughter. KO first round, but then they'd let it continue because Americans love gore.
What kind of Don King "Thrilla in Manila" title should it have?
2007-05-04 04:47:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The problem is that Dawkins doesn't do debates anymore, because he realizes how pointless they are.
And besides, that's not even fair. It'd be like a UFC fighter in the ring with my 4 year old cousin, who's mentally handicapped and blind.
Edit:
Wow, I can't believe I just used Alexis in an analogy to Mike Seaver....I suck. Lets change that over to "Chuck Norris in the UFC ring with anybody."
2007-05-04 04:52:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Until today, I had not heard of Kirk Cameron, and I still know nothing about him except the name, and by inference that he is a theist of some sort. Which automatically makes his intelligence suspect, so Dawkins would tear him to pieces. If you'll supply the popcorn, I'll bring the beer.
2007-05-04 05:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cameron's Classic Clash in the Cameroons with the Deadly Dawkins Dashing Derriere ( God thats a Stretch :-)
2007-05-04 04:51:55 · answer #3 · answered by Mictlan_KISS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hiya, Jon, i have not been on presently, because i fairly have had to a lot to do; besides the indisputable fact that, when I suggested you had a question, I knew it would want to be solid. nicely, i do not fairly comprehend how i might want to confront your brothers and sisters. How do you tell a blind man or woman what the shade blue appears like? How do you tell a deaf man or woman what a fowl's track appears like? you won't be able to make someone who's blind and deaf to attractiveness, a lot less good judgment, change his/her thoughts. I recommend praying for them. also, i might want to ask that you inquire into the "least of those." i assume you comprehend what I recommend. Ask your brothers and sister what they ought to do about the least of those. Do they actually believe that they are to easily ignore concerning the unfavourable and oppressed until eventually the unfavourable and oppressed come to understand Jesus? Love has to initiate someplace. Have they ever examine Micah 6:8? "He has confirmed you, O guy, what's solid. And what does the Lord require of you? to act justly, and to love mercy, and to stroll humbly mutually with your God." human beings have a bent to push aside what right now contradicts their perspectives. Your buddy, Emerson
2016-12-05 08:27:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love to see a debate on Creation vs. Evolution between Dr. Kent Hovind and Richard Dawkins. Kent would eat him alive. Evolutionists are totally unprepared to debate experienced and knowledgable creationists. He's done over 80 debates at universities, and the evolutionists lost every time.
2007-05-04 04:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be a good one for sure
And for luv..you'd never see that debate because your dr is sitting in jail for, what was it...58 tax offenses and a couple other things. And didn't he go to UNaccredited schools. And yet this is the man you choose to believe?
2007-05-04 05:05:25 · answer #6 · answered by photogrl262000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thing is, for the most part arguing with theists is useless.
I received this answer after explaining evolution to a christian:
"Believe what you will, but I will just sit here and sing sing sing for Jesus :)"
It would be entertaining - and horrifying - to see how uneducated most americans are, though.
2007-05-04 04:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by eldad9 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"The Irresistible Force meets Mikey Seaver".
2007-05-04 04:50:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. Dawkins would faint like a girl!
2007-05-04 04:52:52 · answer #9 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bring that on!!!
Better than 300 movie for sure.
And
1 proud Atheist v/s 1 million idiot fundie christians!
2007-05-04 04:50:09 · answer #10 · answered by Real christian 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋