Please give reasons why you give this answer and some evidence too if possible. :)
2007-05-04 01:46:33 · 7 answers · asked by peace 2 in Environment
Global warming is Gore's trying to save hem some fuel for his air plain but u can walk.
2007-05-04 04:00:11 · answer #1 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's just say for theories sake we were suppose to go into an Ice Age, after all according to some scientist we are due. We are also over due for a pandemic but that hasn't happened yet why? Because we as mankind have changed the parameters. We have better , research, medicines and treatment than ever before so we have changed or postponed the outcome on some disease. Now getting back to the Ice Age scenario, 2/3 thirds of the population have recently joined the industrial revolution (China and India some Eastern European countries) using coal burning for electricity and more gas burning cars now than ever before. That is a 66% increase in air pollution alone. Now add to that all the solid waste that is generated and the land pollution that is created that eventually gets into the water.
Now what does common sense tell you? Pollution and Climate change/Global warming go together. We need to find cleaner alternative ways of generating power to run our privileged possessions. We don't have to live like cave people or pioneers we just have to find a better way, a cleaner way of living. Politics and partisan support aside and those that treat this as something that is just in vogue or don't believe it same on you. This is a real situation we have to open our own eyes and minds and ask what do we see? Nevermind what Al Gore says or George Bush says or any celebrity who is for or against this topic. What do your senses tell you?
2007-05-04 15:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is just the normal variation in temperature. Just a few short years ago they were talking about the coming ice age. I don't think there is any reason to panic. Besides the changes that we would have to make to supposedly "fix" it would cost trillions of dollars and have virtually no effect. A lot of the fixes are welfare for 3rd world countries. I'm not a scientist, but I am a thinker.
2007-05-04 09:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by en tu cabeza 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The latest revelation that the Arctic ice cap is melting much faster than the models indicated illustrates why any theory about this is no more than a wild guess. It is impossible to accurately model something as large and complex as global climate.
While I fully believe that it is a good idea to cut emissions and preserve resources as best we can, do it in the name of taking care of the environment, not because of some fad theory that is inaccurate at best, totally wrong at worst.
2007-05-04 08:56:25 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think most effects of climate change can be attibuted to TSI, the total output of the sun across the entire spectum. Similar increases in temperature and polar ice reduction are being studied on Mars.
2007-05-04 09:52:33 · answer #5 · answered by Noah Tall 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since we still coming out of the ice age, it will be impossible to determine the world right temperature.
2007-05-04 08:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by argus 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
http://www.davidsuzuki.org
This is a good website that will give you lots of info.
2007-05-04 10:49:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋