god made us u loser, and if u dont beleive in god u can go to hell
2007-05-04 00:27:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
I think there have been many Big Bangs in the past, it's something that has been going on forever and will continue to do so.. universes expanding then collapsing then exploding outwards again.
It's just something that has been and always will.
It didn't come from anywhere, it won't go anywhere. It just is.
As for human life, I think bacteria was carried on the back of a comet from some other solar system and it landed on our planet and provided a starting point for life.
We are regularly being showered with organic matter, for instance the red rain which fell a few years ago was organic matter but it had no DNA, so obviously wasn't native to Earth.
2007-05-04 00:45:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Who created the Big Bang?" - WHAT a silly question! How on earth do you get through life believing that a person is behind everything that happens?
Is God still holding up the sky in your world? He had that task for millennia, you know - until science discovered what the sky actually was.
Given your dim understanding of reality, I suppose it's too much to hope that you would ever get that evolution is not a process of 'chance' at all.
CD
2007-05-04 00:30:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its the age old question, "what came first, the chicken or the egg." Many christians use this same arguement to prove us wrong. But what I find oxymoronic, is that they are unable to believe that a "big bang" created the universe, because the actual bang itself must've had a creator.....but then, who created God? And who created the creator of God? It's a paradox that nobody will ever be able to comprehend.
2007-05-04 00:58:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Abby C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow ... let's put it simple for you, might be better ...:
Chance is the only factor that created the big bang, makes evolution proceed, and finally led to the evolution of human life.
Chance is not a person. Therefore, the question "who" makes no sense at all.
2007-05-04 00:48:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by NaturalBornKieler 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're asking several different questions here. Evolution is a biological theory, whereas questions about the big bang belong to physics and cosmology. If a person accepts evolution, it doesn't necessarily follow that they know everything about the big bang, or even believe that it happened.
Also, being an atheist doesn't mean that you know anything at all about either of these things. All you need to have to be an atheist is a lack of belief in God. It doesn't mean you're automatically interested in science.
2007-05-04 00:36:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by murnip 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
hey. Very happy you're questioning approximately this as your be conscious of-how is obviously plenty greater suitable than that of maximum people who ask questions approximately this. the familiar of solutions you have gotten is in direct relation to the familiar of the question. besides to what others have published, I opt to grant you this... As you reported, mutations be triumphant or fail depending on organic determination which isn't random. Like others have reported, the mutations themselves are in basic terms partly random on condition that some are greater probable than others. yet one final element to attain is THAT there are mutations isn't random. Mutations are the end results of a gene's much less-than-suited constancy. What do I advise via this and why is it significant? If our genes copied themselves with suited constancy, there could be no mutations to communicate of. for this reason, there could be no version and with out version there could be no organic determination and no speciation. in short, there could be no evolution... it would be impossible. So is this an beginning for a author to describe this "mandatory infidelity?" under no circumstances. think of billions of years in the past with 2 separate replicators wonderful out interior the primordial ooze. One replicates itself completely each and every time on an identical time as the different replicates itself completely ninety 9.9% of the time. Which one is going to have greater adaptable "offspring" able to surviving in dissimilar environments? I ought to wish the respond is sparkling. And why? organic determination. it is the *imperfection* of the device that makes it artwork. the basically suited element i might elect to bypass away you with is a few numbers to back up what somebody else replaced into asserting approximately sexual duplicate. Scientists estimate that each and every human is able to producing 2^23 (8,388,608) unique intercourse cells. this suggests that in the time of sexual duplicate one couple on my own has the aptitude to make 2^23 * 2^23 = 2^40 six unique infants. it fairly is 70,368,804,177,664 achieveable mixtures representing that many achieveable offspring from 2 human beings. See, whether there is an factor of randomness, it is not that vast of a deal because of the fact it remains biology. the percentages have been a million:70,368,804,177,664 of you being you -- and seem, there you're. And had it been any of the 70,368,804,177,663 different opportunities, they could have been blown away via the percentages too.
2017-01-09 11:22:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by buono 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only answer that makes sense is that existence is random and acausal. That accounts for the big bang. Abiogenesis had to be a matter of pure chance, but given the existence of the first self-replicating unit of matter (the first 'life', if you like), evolution was inevitable, and it led to every living organism that we have ever discovered on Earth, including you and me.
2007-05-04 00:44:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Once upon a time, there was an elf playing pool with a mermaid, and the elf said "corner pocket" but the mermaid flashed him a little fin, and he slipped, leaving the cue ball to go soaring into outerspace, creating an implotion and that is how our world came to be.
praise ye to the elf and mermaid from a far off distant planet!
What? that makes just as much sense as some All mighty being creating it.
2007-05-04 00:44:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by apple 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Christian, do you believe human life came from Adam and Eve. That would be incest wouldn't it? Who created the big bang explosion of your own stupidity? That would be you.
2007-05-04 00:29:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lynnemarie 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sorry, it is hard to go from dinosaurs on the Ark to preordained.
It is tough being an atheist.
You have to withstand challenge after challenge that the truth is real.
That folk stories and lore are more important than science.
Argue with your friends about Dinosaurs.
2007-05-04 00:38:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋