How can you prove creationists wrong?

Question

What is the first argument you would normally use against a creationist?

Answer 1

You'd have better luck trying to suck an elephant through a straw.

Answer 2

It is impossible to prove a creationalist wrong. All present science promotes the theory that the universe is created in a big bang. All present data suggests that the universe has an underlying symetry as if designed by a supreme intelligence. The issue comes when ignorant people try to assert that religious myths and metaphors are meant to be literally interpreted. For instance, a bible crazy person will say the earth and all life forms are created in 6 days.
However, nowhere in the bible does it stipulate how long (in earth terms) is a day for the creator.
Some christians think that God creates everything directly, but there is no reasonable argument to support this. God works in mysterious ways, so likely prefers indirect methods.

The basic argument that will always flumox an atheist is that the universe cannot have just appeared without a cause, or a source of energy. You can't get something from nothing, therefore something has been eternally present.

A person who believes in random generation from nothing might also believe that a magician really does magic, yet a magician always has a method behind his illusion. Atheists deny the magician exists, and ignorant theists deny there is method to the illusion. They are both wrong.

Answer 3

properly, no longer being a creationist, yet nonetheless a believing Christian, i've got confidence such as you're lacking the boat from the Christian attitude. To many Christians (fairly people who might finally end up as creationists) the Bible is the familiar, because of the fact of this whether that's interior the Bible, no different information is mandatory, whether that's isn't, and conflicts with the Bible, then it isn't any longer genuine. that's what a familiar is, via definition- it is like a ruler or a protractor- any attitude that the protractor does not degree as ninety ranges isn't ninety ranges. whether, you ought to word that a lot of human beings, some even very truthful and in any different case good scientists, purchase into into creationism or smart layout. Creationists and smart layout persons DO generally and long discourse on why those theories are genuine and evolution isn't. i've got confidence they are incorrect, yet I nonetheless have confidence in a private God, and nonetheless have confidence interior the Bible interior the main literal way that's taken with out making the earth in basic terms approximately 7000 years previous. In different words, you have basically in basic terms been uncovered to the anti-evolution propaganda, do no longer difficulty, finally you will see the different types accessible. the main severe element for many creationist media is basically to forged doubt upon evolution- to no longer seek for converts yet to guard the religion of those already converted. which ability the keeping the Biblical account isn't priority, trashing the 'conflicting' account is. besides, take it as you will, yet i be conscious of, as specific or greater definitely as i be conscious of that creationism is bunk, that God exists, is very own, and cares regarding the human beings on Planet Earth. The greater Biology, Chemistry, and Physics I study, the greater specific i'm of it. And having study the different solutions now, I consider the man who stated posting in Spirituality. Sorry if I brought about any disharmony myself, no belligerent reason on my section.

Answer 4

It depends what arguments they bring up. Some good ones to start with are:
- The existence of fossils.
- Light arriving on Earth from distances greater than the biblical time of creation.
- The fact that evolution is not in fact entirely random (many creationists claim it is, but in fact it is not).
- The existence of ethnicities with significantly different physical characteristics which would have taken some time to develop.
- Carbon-14 dating.
- The fact that only two people (that is to say Adam and Eve) would not have enough genetic differences to produce generations of successful offspring.
- The existence of transient fossils (many creationists complain that there are no transient fossils, but again this can be easily shown to be false).

Answer 5

You can use every argument under the sun, but you won't change a mind that is welded shut. I have used geology and plate tectonics to establish the age of the earth, the response was "God created the world with an apparent age". Then I asked "Why?" - the reply "to give us something to do."

Logic takes a flying leap off a building when you talk to a anyone who is not willing to listen and think. You think they're crazy for their beliefs, they think you're crazy. There is no way to win, but a good discussion helps you both learn more about other's views and solidify or change your own.

Answer 6

There is no more need to attempt to prove them wrong that to prove that santa claus does not exist. They made a claim, and they have the burden of providing evidence to support their claim. It is ridiculous for anyone to believe that creationism should be accepted as having any validity unless and until evidence against it is provided.

Answer 7

Prove Hoyle's math to be in error...

The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primordial soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence. - Sir Fredrick Hoyle, Nature Nov. 1981

Answer 8

Trying to disprove the creationist idea is kind of stupid... Mostly because the whole idea of it is faith... which is believing in what you can't see...

Besides... why bother trying to destroy hope in someone's life? If the person you intend on using whatever argument you get out of this is trying to make you believe in some religion, that just means they care about you and want to share their hope about the afterlife with you.

Answer 9

My question to you is why do you feel the need to prove anyone or any belief wrong?
Surely you can understand that this need people have to be right is the exact thing that causes so much pain and suffering around the world. Let others believe as they wish. stay true to what you feel is right for you.

Answer 10

The genome holds the ultimate forensic proof of evolution. A genome with 98+% of nucleobase sequences that have nothing to do with protein construction (genes) is obviously not intelligently designed. And when we look at that "genetic junk" we find sequences like the genes of ancestral forms, which have been deactivated by stop codons.

But not even a smoking gun will convince someone as closed minded as a creationist.

Answer 11

Make up your mind -- do you want proof or arguments? You can argue all day long, and your arguments may be brilliant, but you can't prove creationists wrong. However, neither can they prove you wrong. It's always been a standoff, still is, and always will be.