I've spent some time over in the Biology section, and in the Earth Sciences/Geology section, where people are discussing various aspects of evolution.
No one is discussing creationism or intelligent design.
So why do you post your challenges against evolutiuon here, and not there where there are many people who are very capable of addressing such challenges?
Does it say something that you are only willing to post your challenges in a group intended to discuss faith and not science, rather than post your challenges to a group where science is the proper topic of discussion?
2007-05-03 12:39:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yeah, sad huh? Remember most creationists don't believe in science, they think its part of an evil satanist agenda. Some believe its god trying to test their faith, makes sense doesn't it? Unfortunately some people aren't big fans of thinking.
2007-05-03 12:44:18 · answer #1 · answered by Diagoras 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
the main argument between christians and science should not be evolutionism versis creationism. It's funny that christians argue creationism. Creationism is an idea created by moses. The religion of moses was the prevailing religion of Jesus's time. Jesus is famous for exposing the fact that the prevailing religion was wrong ie: moses is wrong. The only christians who should be supporting the idea of creationism are the one's who think christ was wrong. Secondly Moses killed hundreds of thousands of people he brags about it in the bible he's like a psyco serial killer. Any one with any moral values should reject the teachings of moses. So the only christians who should support the idea of creationism are the ones who thing christ was wrong and have no moral values. Lastly Moses aka Mr psycho serial killer is the one teaching the values of thou shalt not kill. I'm not going to take moral guidance from a psycho. The real debat between science and religion should be about whether this world is the ultimate reality concrete and absolute or is this world and illusion part of some larger reality that is absolute. For any religion on earth to be possible this has to be an illusion. If time and space where absolute their would be no room for anything else. Where would heaven be at the far edge of the universe? How would you get their fly for the next gazzillion years?
I don't support evolutionism either. If this is an illusion evolution is an illusion. If time is an illusion constructed by consciousness how can a time based event be anything more than a product of consciousness.
2007-05-03 19:49:38 · answer #2 · answered by daviddepape 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
This is the religious section and if they want to come here they do.. If we go there they don't want to hear the bible and say we should be in R&S , which is true..
So they really don't want us there..
What is it that makes you think that evolution is more than a theory?? You act like science is a fact and some science is still theory.. So don't be so dumb and act like it is a fact just because scientist are studying and coming up with THEORYS..
2007-05-03 19:42:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the most part the challenges are to the faithful about creationism. It is called Yahoo Answers isn't it?
2007-05-03 19:53:49 · answer #4 · answered by hisgloryisgreat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have it backwards. We come here to discuss the things of God, and various religious beliefs.
The atheists and other heathens come here to discuss evolution.
You can go there to the science section and discuss evolution until you evolve yourself for all I care. Argue evolution until you die. I have too much to think about to make evolution vs. creation my life's pursuit. If that is all you have to worry about, it must be nice to be you.
2007-05-03 19:51:14 · answer #5 · answered by Darryl L 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"post your challenges in a group intended to discuss faith"
you answered your own question really.
2007-05-03 21:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by alphaomegadisciple 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there is a lot of gibberish from evolutionists
my experience is that they almost never realize the prior assumptions they bring to the table as they generally believe have a prior commitment to a naturalistic philosophy before looking at the data
in effect, they have a prior commitment to a religous work view before looking at the data... pretty much what you accuse creationists of
2007-05-03 19:46:22 · answer #7 · answered by whirlingmerc 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
From your Q/A looks to me like you spend most of your time here. One question in Zoology. Maybe you're spending time in the wrong place.
2007-05-03 19:47:06 · answer #8 · answered by <><><> 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You idiots are the ones who brought it here. Better question- why do you atheists come to a forum intended just for the reasons you mentioned, and make such asses out of yourselves?
2007-05-03 19:45:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They don't post it there because Biology is filed under Science.
2007-05-03 19:43:06 · answer #10 · answered by The Bog Nug 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋