I can't tell you anything from personal experience or anything....BUT, there was a Sex and The City about this, lol.
The guy got circumcized, and then all of a sudden he was like crazy with his penis and started sleeping with everybody because he thought it felt better and wanted to share it with the world!!! hahahaha
Now, I do have a friend who is not circumcized, all of his family is that way. However, he had a cousin I think who decided to get his done when he was older, and he regretted it....
I'm sure it's different for everybody.
I'd definitely research it A LOT before actually doing it. It's not something you can just put back!! lol
2007-05-03 12:14:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by jezyka 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
If anything, the lovemaking sensation will change drastically for him. Penile foreskin is jam packed with nerves, and as such is VERY sensitive to stimulation. Based on locker room guy talk convos I've had with friends, the sensation of being circumcised is incomparable to that of having foreskin.
Ask your husband what his reasons are for doing this. That might give you some clarity in the situation.
2007-05-03 19:16:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mistah J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Circumcision has the advantage of better hygiene. Also, I have read that it may help prevent cervical cancer for the partner. Your husband should go to a reputable urologist. The modern day procedure and medicines keeps the discomfort to a minimum. He should use ice packs after the procedure to keep the swelling down which, in turn, will help reduce any discomfort. See link below to find an urologist in your area: http://www.urologyhealth.org/find_urologist/
2007-05-03 19:36:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Maiden Fair 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
My husband had his circumcised when he was 40, due to recurrent yeast infections. The doctor, and us, felt that since he had more than three a year, this could lead to cancer. The only problem he has now, is that his head is so exposed that it is much more sensitive. Harder for him to stay erect for long periods of time. The yeast infections are gone, so there is one good thing. But if your husband doesn't have a medical reason, I would recommend not doing it, as it is used to the comfort cover. Good luck! As for me, not a whole lot different, other than it's quicker than before....
2007-05-03 19:16:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by flower 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is really not that much different....it is just less skin. I had sex with an uncircumcised man and feel that the sex is the same...but the oral sex was something totally different for me. I could not get over the forskin....which is more of a personal preference. So I say that it will be the same sexual wise...it is more based on a personal perference than anything else I believe.
2007-05-03 19:17:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nikki T 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
He will just have a little less on him. Honestly, I do not think he should do it, but that's my opinion. If he gets circumcised, he will be less likely to get an infection down there. Never been in that situation.
2007-05-03 19:17:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by no name 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Circumcised here at the age of 30. It was done because of odor under the foreskin, no other reason.
Sexually, it was different at first for me, but very little. My wife said their was no difference for her. In the act, the foreskin is pushed back automatically. So there will be very little cause for you to feel any different.
Be kind to your husband, the idea of surgery down there was traumatic. But, I survived.
2007-05-03 19:15:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by txguy8800 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have been with both circumcised and un. It does feel better having it circumcised, because you can feel the head (top of the penis) more . Sometimes the foreskin of an uncircumcised penis covers the head and you don't get as much pleasure. With it circumcised you feel it more and it can hit your spot easier.
2007-05-03 19:15:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by goofy1770 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've only been with circumcised men and I was always pleased. I think one big difference is the cleanliness and men may feel a little pressure from society.
2007-05-03 19:13:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Luv2RIDE 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
well in truth it may feel a little different but not anything drastic.But for health and cleanliness reasons it is better to be circumcised.That extra skin when not expanded is nothing but a trap for germs and...how can I say this.. urine that dries and doesn't quite make it to its original destination.LOL!
I am sure he is a very clean guy, don't get me wrong but in truth it only takes one time when you mess around and he don't clean up good enough for that to incubate and end up giving him an infection.
Now, most people get this done when they are still babies and I am sure now that he is an adult and his skin is tuffer, this will be a very painful surgery that will take some time to heal.It will also take him much longer to get used to it then you.But regardless for the benefits health wise, its certainly the better choice to have it done.
2007-05-03 19:18:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by vmaxer85 4
·
1⤊
0⤋