CHRISTIAN and ATHEISTS the same???

Question

Now that I got your attention... hehe

Here's a serious question:

WHICH WOULD YOU PREFER,
a black, male president - OR
a white, female president?

I'm so glad to see that America has come this far. I never thought I'd see the day where a black man, and a woman were favored candidates for presidency. What are your reasonings for your choice?

For those of you who say, "It shouldn't matter what sex or race... bleh bleh bleh... " Please... we alllll know it "shouldn't" matter. Stop trying to be all politically correct. The fact is, this is a turning point in history... IT DOES MATTER...

Answer 1

Right now, there's only one thing I care about in a Presidential candidate. And that's someone who has a brain. In the position our current president has gotten us into, we don't have the luxury of being concerned about something as insignificant as the race or sex of the president. We need to get someone in there who's smart, who's diplomatic, and who is more concerned with doing right by the American people than he is with taking care of his high-profile friends.

Answer 2

I don't like either of the candidates to whom you are referring. Obama seems like a genuinely decent guy, but I don't agree with his stance in many areas important to me. Hillary has set the women's movement back around forty years, since her fake response of shock to Bill's cheating was basically a free pass for anyone to cheat on his or her spouse. Also, she is about as far left in reality as anyone can be without being a Communist. I'm hoping Giuliani gets the Republican nod. I find him to be fairly moderate in comparison to the others, and I would have no problem voting for him. But if I HAD to vote for one of the other two, Obama all the way. He has something Hillary will never have: character.

Answer 3

An Atheist President!

Answer 4

What I'd really like to see is one of them be candidate, the other running mate. But that won't happen, so i vote for the female. Color has nothing to do with it, I'd like to see a woman as President.

Answer 5

I'd rather have one that would be a good leader. I don't know enough about the policies of the ones you're referring to, to know if either fit those criteria. It seems that Obamais inexperienced though. I think he'd be better off waiting a while so more people can get used to him. Everybody knows about Clinton.

Answer 6

Yes they are the same. They are both sinners. One is saved the other is simply on hold.

I would prefer a conservitive president I could care less about skin color or sex or the person.

So the real answer to your question is I don't want to see Either Hillary or Obama as president.

I'd vote for Alan Keyes or Condalisa Rice

Answer 7

you ultimate and not ultimate intemediatary systems would or won't have an impression. first occasion peacocks the colours, outragous tails for sure are a hinderance. however the ladies like it. because of the fact of sexual selection the different of what might seem the logical selection is what is going to become dominant. so the theory that rudementary structers are inhibitory subsequently illogical is exactly the factor 2d occasion wings of grasshopper. from my zoology proffessor he stated the suited theory so some distance is the wings began out as protusions of difficult shell and grew. the longer larger proturions helped preserve the leg and air ducts. yet over the years as those grew greater suitable for greater secure practices finally they grew to alter into waiting to decide on the flow. properly now the lighter thinner allowed greater gliding. later to evolve into wings. so its no longer constantly a right away step. each and every from time to time it would desire to bypass by many many approaches no longer understood or seen. there are such particularly some factors for christianity the ideas that its all a brilliant *** leap of religion is quite propeganda. the main important project i think of for some human beings is the 7 day tale. properly seem back on church historic previous and the early jewish instructors (the adult adult males who began this entire element) didnt instruct it replaced into literal. Pope Augustine (i beieve it replaced into him honesty one pope starts off to mixture in with yet another, i didnt carry my books with me) wrote it replaced into stupid to think of it as litteral. the frenzy to instruct this and each thing interior the bible as one hundred% literal take all of it or no longer something got here while martin luthor broke off frm the church. many of the bible that persons have contridictions with are basically as fairly defined. yet few do the google seek for 'bible contridictions defined'... i do consider you that some on the two factors persist with thier ideas blindly and could in no way settle for watching something that would desire to challange thier ideals. a lot of human beings do no longer care approximately studying and growing to be basically in proving to everybody else why they are suited... its the macho highschool penis waving. talkin out your butt, we see this everyywhere no longer in basic terms right here. im specific yall have somebody at artwork who basically talkes and clearly has no theory of validity. that's the reason many situations what you notice indexed right here are no longer genuine solutions basically airborne dirt and mud and slogans thrown around.

Answer 8

I have no problem with either race or sex , But I have a problem with the candidates they are fake communists that want to control us and Obomma has no stance on anything he skirts the issues while Hill lies.

Answer 9

It shouldn't matter what sex or race they are what matters is what they stand for. Period. I hate hearing stuff like this it makes the whole country sound bad... I should say worse.

Answer 10

Whichever one was most qualified for the job, regardless of race or sex.