I think that that question doesn't make sense. The thing they have in common is that they both explain something. They both explain the same thing. God answers Why & science answers How. My answer would be God AND science. Do you agree?
2007-05-03 09:56:59 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The infinity of Universal Power is scientific enough for me. Thank you.
2007-05-03 10:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that science proves the existence of God. Also science is a fragment of the omnipotence of God.
2007-05-03 10:08:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally for me there is just science. I see no need for a god.
However, if others do see a need for a god then I have no real problem with that as long as it is God AND science.
When people say god OVER science then they just make themselves look foolish.
2007-05-03 10:39:29 · answer #3 · answered by Simon T 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If God were real then it would have to be God AND science. God would have created science.
2007-05-03 10:04:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I choose GOD, all the time!
2007-05-03 10:12:35 · answer #5 · answered by shamara43 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋