Do you favor cutting back on regulations pertaining to hazardous chemicals in order to help balance the federal budget? What laws or regulations, if any, would you cut back on? Defend your answer.
2007-05-03 07:29:04 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
The federal goverment does not have to pay money to regulate hazardous chemicals.
Industry has to comply with the regulations. Industry funds the EPA and other institutions through taxes, fines and grants.
If industry dumps Toxic Glowing dirt into a landfill, the full weight and power of the government will fall on industry's neck and force them to clean it up and charge them $$$ more than it should normally cost.
Where is this applicable? Military installations. Should government exempt military installations from compliance? no. If it is good enough for industry, then it is good enough for government.
2007-05-03 09:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by Christmas Light Guy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If u use the chemicals correctly there is no hazardous chemicals.
Example
HCL bad acid
Caustic soda bad base.
mix together to a ph 7 and what u have
Table salt and water. All chemicals can be neutralized .
2007-05-03 08:29:05 · answer #2 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋